Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Continuous learning as a threat to care

Robert Sparrow*, Zachary Daus, Mark Howard, Joshua Hatherley, Patrick Kwan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To highlight the risk that the use of adaptive machine learning systems may result in clinicians spending more time on computers and less time caring for patients.

Methods: Philosophical and ethical reflection on issues identified in the literature on human-computer interaction.

Results: Adaptive machine learning systems learn from data generated by their use. Managing the process by which these systems improve is likely to require that clinicians pay more attention to them than they do to other software. The call for “explainable AI” will create a new “hermeneutic burden” for clinicians when it comes to the use of these systems.

Conclusions: Adaptive machine learning systems are likely to exacerbate problems associated with computers becoming the “third party in the room” during clinical consultations. A key challenge is to ensure that the application of adaptive learning enhances, rather than damages, the relationship between clinician and patient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-385
Number of pages5
JournalHealth and Technology
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adaptive learning
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Clinical Consultation
  • Continuous Learning
  • Ethics
  • Explainable AI
  • Hermeneutic Burden
  • Machine Learning
  • Medicine
  • Patient-Clinician Relationship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous learning as a threat to care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this