Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities

Tracey Bretag, Rowena Harper, Kiata Rundle, Philip M. Newton, Cath Ellis, Sonia Saddiqui, Karen van Haeringen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support.

LanguageEnglish
Pages125-139
Number of pages15
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume45
Issue number1
Early online date24 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

university
education
student
educator
Teaching
social support
vulnerability
learning environment
research project
staff
experience

Keywords

  • academic integrity
  • Contract cheating
  • higher education providers
  • NUHEPs
  • universities

Cite this

Bretag, Tracey ; Harper, Rowena ; Rundle, Kiata ; Newton, Philip M. ; Ellis, Cath ; Saddiqui, Sonia ; van Haeringen, Karen. / Contract cheating in Australian higher education : a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities. In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2020 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 125-139.
@article{1c0992b64a7b497d83187cb019518452,
title = "Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities",
abstract = "This article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support.",
keywords = "academic integrity, Contract cheating, higher education providers, NUHEPs, universities",
author = "Tracey Bretag and Rowena Harper and Kiata Rundle and Newton, {Philip M.} and Cath Ellis and Sonia Saddiqui and {van Haeringen}, Karen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "125--139",
journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "0260-2938",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Contract cheating in Australian higher education : a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities. / Bretag, Tracey; Harper, Rowena; Rundle, Kiata; Newton, Philip M.; Ellis, Cath; Saddiqui, Sonia; van Haeringen, Karen.

In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2020, p. 125-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contract cheating in Australian higher education

T2 - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

AU - Bretag, Tracey

AU - Harper, Rowena

AU - Rundle, Kiata

AU - Newton, Philip M.

AU - Ellis, Cath

AU - Saddiqui, Sonia

AU - van Haeringen, Karen

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support.

AB - This article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support.

KW - academic integrity

KW - Contract cheating

KW - higher education providers

KW - NUHEPs

KW - universities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066302032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 125

EP - 139

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 0260-2938

IS - 1

ER -