TY - JOUR
T1 - Contract cheating in Australian higher education
T2 - a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities
AU - Bretag, Tracey
AU - Harper, Rowena
AU - Rundle, Kiata
AU - Newton, Philip M.
AU - Ellis, Cath
AU - Saddiqui, Sonia
AU - van Haeringen, Karen
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support.
AB - This article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support.
KW - academic integrity
KW - Contract cheating
KW - higher education providers
KW - NUHEPs
KW - universities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066302032&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146
DO - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066302032
SN - 0260-2938
VL - 45
SP - 125
EP - 139
JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
IS - 1
ER -