Contracting-out urban primary health care in Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration of implementation processes and experience

Rubana Islam, Shahed Hossain, Farzana Bashar, Shaan Muberra Khan, Adel A. S. Sikder, Sifat Shahana Yusuf, Alayne M. Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Contracting-out (CO) to non-state providers is used widely to increase access to health care, but it entails many implementation challenges. Using Bangladesh’s two decades of experience with contracting out Urban Primary Health Care (UPHC), this paper identifies contextual, contractual, and actor-related factors that require consideration when implementing CO in Low- and Middle- Income Countries.

Methods: This qualitative case-study is based on 42 in-depth interviews with past and present stakeholders working with the government and the UPHC project, as well as a desk review of key project documents. The Health Policy Triangle framework is utilized to differentiate among multiple intersecting contextual, contractual and actor-related factors that characterize and influence complex implementation processes.

Results: In Bangladesh, the contextual factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic to the health system, deeply impacted the CO process. These included competition with other health projects, public sector reforms, and the broader national level political and bureaucratic environment. Providing free services to the poor and a target to recover cost were two contradictory conditions set out in the contract and were difficult for providers to achieve. In relation to actors, the choice of the executing body led to complications, functionally disempowering local government institutions (cities and municipalities) from managing CO processes, and discouraging integration of CO arrangements into the broader national health system. Politics and power dynamics undermined the ethical selection of project areas. Ultimately, these and other factors weakened the project’s ability to achieve one of its original objectives: to decentralize management responsibilities and develop municipal capacity in managing contracts.

Conclusions: This study calls attention to factors that need to be addressed to successfully implement CO projects, both in Bangladesh and similar countries. Country ownership is crucial for adapting and integrating CO in national health systems. Concurrent processes must be ensured to develop local CO capacity. CO modalities must be adaptable and responsive to changing context, while operating within an agreed-upon and appropriate legal framework with a strong ethical foundation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number93
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal for Equity in Health
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Contracting-out
  • Primary healthcare
  • Health systems
  • Urban health
  • Non-state actors
  • Bangladesh

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contracting-out urban primary health care in Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration of implementation processes and experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this