Conversation analysis and family therapy: a critical review of methodology

Ben Ong, Scott Barnes, Niels Buus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article critiques the use of conversation analysis (CA) as applied to the study of family therapy. Searches of relevant databases and journals as well as citation searches were conducted in April 2018 for relevant articles. Inclusion criteria included the explicit use of CA either solely or in combination with discourse analysis and discursive psychology. This resulted in the inclusion of 25 articles that were reviewed against a guideline for the evaluation of qualitative research to which five items specific to CA were added to ensure a specific and balanced evaluation of the studies. Articles generally had a good application of quality criteria although there was a variation in detail of transcription, application of sequence analysis, and a limited use of validity testing. CA has the potential to complement existing research on family therapy but requires a rigorous application of process and quality criteria. The article provides recommendations for future CA research into family therapy.

LanguageEnglish
JournalFamily Process
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Family Therapy
conversation analysis
family therapy
methodology
Qualitative Research
Research
inclusion
Sequence Analysis
Databases
Guidelines
Psychology
evaluation
discourse analysis
qualitative research
psychology

Keywords

  • conversation analysis
  • family therapy
  • review

Cite this

@article{f837c1634c4240d49a1872f4ef782932,
title = "Conversation analysis and family therapy: a critical review of methodology",
abstract = "This article critiques the use of conversation analysis (CA) as applied to the study of family therapy. Searches of relevant databases and journals as well as citation searches were conducted in April 2018 for relevant articles. Inclusion criteria included the explicit use of CA either solely or in combination with discourse analysis and discursive psychology. This resulted in the inclusion of 25 articles that were reviewed against a guideline for the evaluation of qualitative research to which five items specific to CA were added to ensure a specific and balanced evaluation of the studies. Articles generally had a good application of quality criteria although there was a variation in detail of transcription, application of sequence analysis, and a limited use of validity testing. CA has the potential to complement existing research on family therapy but requires a rigorous application of process and quality criteria. The article provides recommendations for future CA research into family therapy.",
keywords = "conversation analysis, family therapy, review",
author = "Ben Ong and Scott Barnes and Niels Buus",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1111/famp.12431",
language = "English",
journal = "Family Process",
issn = "0014-7370",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",

}

Conversation analysis and family therapy : a critical review of methodology. / Ong, Ben; Barnes, Scott; Buus, Niels.

In: Family Process, 23.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conversation analysis and family therapy

T2 - Family Process

AU - Ong,Ben

AU - Barnes,Scott

AU - Buus,Niels

PY - 2019/2/23

Y1 - 2019/2/23

N2 - This article critiques the use of conversation analysis (CA) as applied to the study of family therapy. Searches of relevant databases and journals as well as citation searches were conducted in April 2018 for relevant articles. Inclusion criteria included the explicit use of CA either solely or in combination with discourse analysis and discursive psychology. This resulted in the inclusion of 25 articles that were reviewed against a guideline for the evaluation of qualitative research to which five items specific to CA were added to ensure a specific and balanced evaluation of the studies. Articles generally had a good application of quality criteria although there was a variation in detail of transcription, application of sequence analysis, and a limited use of validity testing. CA has the potential to complement existing research on family therapy but requires a rigorous application of process and quality criteria. The article provides recommendations for future CA research into family therapy.

AB - This article critiques the use of conversation analysis (CA) as applied to the study of family therapy. Searches of relevant databases and journals as well as citation searches were conducted in April 2018 for relevant articles. Inclusion criteria included the explicit use of CA either solely or in combination with discourse analysis and discursive psychology. This resulted in the inclusion of 25 articles that were reviewed against a guideline for the evaluation of qualitative research to which five items specific to CA were added to ensure a specific and balanced evaluation of the studies. Articles generally had a good application of quality criteria although there was a variation in detail of transcription, application of sequence analysis, and a limited use of validity testing. CA has the potential to complement existing research on family therapy but requires a rigorous application of process and quality criteria. The article provides recommendations for future CA research into family therapy.

KW - conversation analysis

KW - family therapy

KW - review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061982689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/famp.12431

DO - 10.1111/famp.12431

M3 - Article

JO - Family Process

JF - Family Process

SN - 0014-7370

ER -