Conversation analysis and family therapy: a critical review of methodology

Ben Ong*, Scott Barnes, Niels Buus

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article critiques the use of conversation analysis (CA) as applied to the study of family therapy. Searches of relevant databases and journals as well as citation searches were conducted in April 2018 for relevant articles. Inclusion criteria included the explicit use of CA either solely or in combination with discourse analysis and discursive psychology. This resulted in the inclusion of 25 articles that were reviewed against a guideline for the evaluation of qualitative research to which five items specific to CA were added to ensure a specific and balanced evaluation of the studies. Articles generally had a good application of quality criteria although there was a variation in detail of transcription, application of sequence analysis, and a limited use of validity testing. CA has the potential to complement existing research on family therapy but requires a rigorous application of process and quality criteria. The article provides recommendations for future CA research into family therapy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)460-476
    Number of pages17
    JournalFamily Process
    Volume59
    Issue number2
    Early online date23 Feb 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

    Keywords

    • conversation analysis
    • family therapy
    • review

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conversation analysis and family therapy: a critical review of methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this