Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review

Liliana Laranjo da Silva, Adam G. Dunn, Huong Ly Tong, Ahmet Baki Kocaballi, Jessica Chen, Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Blanca Gallego, Farah Magrabi, Annie Y. S. Lau, Enrico Coiera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

706 Citations (Scopus)
216 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to review the characteristics, current applications, and evaluation measures of conversational agents with unconstrained natural language input capabilities used for health-related purposes.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and ACM Digital using a predefined search strategy. Studies were included if they focused on consumers or healthcare professionals; involved a conversational agent using any unconstrained natural language input; and reported evaluation measures resulting from user interaction with the system. Studies were screened by independent reviewers and Cohen’s kappa measured inter-coder agreement.

Results: The database search retrieved 1513 citations; 17 articles (14 different conversational agents) met the inclusion criteria. Dialogue management strategies were mostly finite-state and frame-based (6 and 7 conversational agents, respectively); agent-based strategies were present in one type of system. Two studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was cross-sectional, and the remaining were quasi-experimental. Half of the conversational agents supported consumers with health tasks such as self-care. The only RCT evaluating the efficacy of a conversational agent found a significant effect in reducing depression symptoms (effect size d = 0.44, p = .04). Patient safety was rarely evaluated in the included studies.

Conclusions: The use of conversational agents with unconstrained natural language input capabilities for health-related purposes is an emerging field of research, where the few published studies were mainly quasi-experimental, and rarely evaluated efficacy or safety. Future studies would benefit from more robust experimental designs and standardized reporting.

Protocol Registration: The protocol for this systematic review is registered at PROSPERO with the number CRD42017065917.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1248–1258
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume25
Issue number9
Early online date13 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2018

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence [Mesh]
  • medical informatics [Mesh]
  • conversational agent
  • dialogue system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this