TY - JOUR
T1 - Coping with complexity in intensive care units
T2 - a systematic literature review of improvement interventions
AU - Bueno, Wagner Pietrobelli
AU - Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu
AU - Wachs, Priscila
AU - Kuchenbecker, Ricardo
AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Intensive care units (ICUs) are complex socio-technical systems. Logically and practically, improvement interventions in these environments should be consistent with their characteristics. This study presents a systematic literature review of 91 studies of interventions in adult ICUs, aiming at assessing the extent to which they account for five guidelines for coping with complexity: (i) supporting visibility of processes and outcomes; (ii) design slack; (iii) encouraging diversity of perspectives when making decisions; (iv) monitoring and understanding the gap between work-as-imagined and work-as-done; and (v) monitoring unintended consequences of improvements and changes. Both qualitative and quantitative assessments of adherence to the guidelines were conducted. In the former, examples of applying the guidelines were grouped under 40 descriptors, offering insights into practical ways of coping with complexity in ICUs. For the latter, guidelines (ii) and (iii) were adopted to a similar extent, greater than the other three guidelines. Results indicate that resilience is theoretically connected to the guidelines and therefore it may have been intuitively adopted by the interventions to some extent. An agenda for future research is proposed.
AB - Intensive care units (ICUs) are complex socio-technical systems. Logically and practically, improvement interventions in these environments should be consistent with their characteristics. This study presents a systematic literature review of 91 studies of interventions in adult ICUs, aiming at assessing the extent to which they account for five guidelines for coping with complexity: (i) supporting visibility of processes and outcomes; (ii) design slack; (iii) encouraging diversity of perspectives when making decisions; (iv) monitoring and understanding the gap between work-as-imagined and work-as-done; and (v) monitoring unintended consequences of improvements and changes. Both qualitative and quantitative assessments of adherence to the guidelines were conducted. In the former, examples of applying the guidelines were grouped under 40 descriptors, offering insights into practical ways of coping with complexity in ICUs. For the latter, guidelines (ii) and (iii) were adopted to a similar extent, greater than the other three guidelines. Results indicate that resilience is theoretically connected to the guidelines and therefore it may have been intuitively adopted by the interventions to some extent. An agenda for future research is proposed.
KW - Complexity
KW - Improvement
KW - Intensive care units
KW - Resilience
KW - Work-as-done
KW - Work-as-imagined
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067389936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.023
DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.023
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85067389936
SN - 0925-7535
VL - 118
SP - 814
EP - 825
JO - Safety Science
JF - Safety Science
ER -