Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit

SJ Brammer, S Pavelin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

699 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Utilizing data on a sample of large firms, we estimate a model of corporate
reputation. We find reputation, derived from the assessments of managers and market analysts, to be determined by a firm’s social performance, financial performance, market risk, the extent of long-term institutional ownership, and the nature of its business activities. Furthermore, the reputational effect of social performance is found to vary both across sectors, and within sectors across the various types of social performance. Specifically, our results demonstrate the need to achieve a ‘fit’ among the types of corporate social performance undertaken and the firm’s stakeholder environment. For example, a strong record of environmental performance may enhance or damage reputation depending on whether the firm’s activities ‘fit’ with environmental concerns in the eyes of stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)435-455
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • FIRM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
  • STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT
  • RESPONSIBILITY
  • PHILANTHROPY
  • PERSPECTIVE
  • LINK

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this