Correct responses, error analyses, and theories of word production

A response to Martin

Lyndsey A. Nickels*, David Howard

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Nickels and Howard (2004) argued that effects of word length on correct responses of a case series of nine aphasic individuals could be accounted for entirely in terms of number of phonemes, and suggested that effects of complexity on correct responses may have been overstated in the literature. In a commentary on this paper, N. Martin disputed some of Nickels and Howard's claims focusing on methodological issues concerning the differences between analysis of errors and correct productions, and the implications of this study for theoretical accounts of word production. Here we respond to those points raised.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)531-536
    Number of pages6
    JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
    Volume21
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correct responses, error analyses, and theories of word production: A response to Martin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this