Correcting malapropisms: strategies to bridge cultural and socioeconomic gaps

Israel Berger, John A. Cartmill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: Although patients and lay people are often more knowledgeable about medical conditions than their predecessors, the dominant culture’s increased involvement in understanding their health and making treatment decisions does not translate into consistently more informed patients. High health literacy is associated with both improved health outcomes and receiving better quality-of-care. Low health literacy disproportionately affects people from marginalized ethnic and language groups. Regardless of how a particular clinician feels about a patient, malapropisms and mis-attributions may cause patients to appear less intelligent or to have lower perceived health literacy, potentially affecting their healthcare experiences with other clinicians. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: This paper discusses the evidence for “up-skilling” patients and uses principles from conversation analysis to demonstrate how malapropisms can be corrected sensitively. Clinician training in skilled communication using the conversation analytic role-play method is also addressed. Findings: Malapropisms are best corrected through modelling rather than calling attention to the error directly, as this allows the patient to save face. Explanations using drawings and clearly written materials may also be useful. Originality/value: Helping patients to improve their communication with clinicians may lead to improved health outcomes through improved quality-of-care.

    LanguageEnglish
    Pages84-94
    Number of pages11
    JournalInternational Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Health Literacy
    health
    literacy
    Quality of Health Care
    Health
    Communication
    language group
    conversation analysis
    communication
    role play
    attribution
    Ethnic Groups
    ethnic group
    conversation
    Decision Making
    Language
    cause
    Delivery of Health Care
    methodology
    evidence

    Cite this

    @article{621aca61eb064e17bc3c8d67c0126e7e,
    title = "Correcting malapropisms: strategies to bridge cultural and socioeconomic gaps",
    abstract = "Purpose: Although patients and lay people are often more knowledgeable about medical conditions than their predecessors, the dominant culture’s increased involvement in understanding their health and making treatment decisions does not translate into consistently more informed patients. High health literacy is associated with both improved health outcomes and receiving better quality-of-care. Low health literacy disproportionately affects people from marginalized ethnic and language groups. Regardless of how a particular clinician feels about a patient, malapropisms and mis-attributions may cause patients to appear less intelligent or to have lower perceived health literacy, potentially affecting their healthcare experiences with other clinicians. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: This paper discusses the evidence for “up-skilling” patients and uses principles from conversation analysis to demonstrate how malapropisms can be corrected sensitively. Clinician training in skilled communication using the conversation analytic role-play method is also addressed. Findings: Malapropisms are best corrected through modelling rather than calling attention to the error directly, as this allows the patient to save face. Explanations using drawings and clearly written materials may also be useful. Originality/value: Helping patients to improve their communication with clinicians may lead to improved health outcomes through improved quality-of-care.",
    keywords = "language, ethnocentrism, healthcare, ethnicity, health literacy, socioeconomic status, race, conversation analysis",
    author = "Israel Berger and Cartmill, {John A.}",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1108/IJHRH-12-2015-0040",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "84--94",
    journal = "International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare",
    issn = "1757-0980",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
    number = "2",

    }

    Correcting malapropisms : strategies to bridge cultural and socioeconomic gaps. / Berger, Israel; Cartmill, John A.

    In: International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2017, p. 84-94.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Correcting malapropisms

    T2 - International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare

    AU - Berger,Israel

    AU - Cartmill,John A.

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Purpose: Although patients and lay people are often more knowledgeable about medical conditions than their predecessors, the dominant culture’s increased involvement in understanding their health and making treatment decisions does not translate into consistently more informed patients. High health literacy is associated with both improved health outcomes and receiving better quality-of-care. Low health literacy disproportionately affects people from marginalized ethnic and language groups. Regardless of how a particular clinician feels about a patient, malapropisms and mis-attributions may cause patients to appear less intelligent or to have lower perceived health literacy, potentially affecting their healthcare experiences with other clinicians. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: This paper discusses the evidence for “up-skilling” patients and uses principles from conversation analysis to demonstrate how malapropisms can be corrected sensitively. Clinician training in skilled communication using the conversation analytic role-play method is also addressed. Findings: Malapropisms are best corrected through modelling rather than calling attention to the error directly, as this allows the patient to save face. Explanations using drawings and clearly written materials may also be useful. Originality/value: Helping patients to improve their communication with clinicians may lead to improved health outcomes through improved quality-of-care.

    AB - Purpose: Although patients and lay people are often more knowledgeable about medical conditions than their predecessors, the dominant culture’s increased involvement in understanding their health and making treatment decisions does not translate into consistently more informed patients. High health literacy is associated with both improved health outcomes and receiving better quality-of-care. Low health literacy disproportionately affects people from marginalized ethnic and language groups. Regardless of how a particular clinician feels about a patient, malapropisms and mis-attributions may cause patients to appear less intelligent or to have lower perceived health literacy, potentially affecting their healthcare experiences with other clinicians. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: This paper discusses the evidence for “up-skilling” patients and uses principles from conversation analysis to demonstrate how malapropisms can be corrected sensitively. Clinician training in skilled communication using the conversation analytic role-play method is also addressed. Findings: Malapropisms are best corrected through modelling rather than calling attention to the error directly, as this allows the patient to save face. Explanations using drawings and clearly written materials may also be useful. Originality/value: Helping patients to improve their communication with clinicians may lead to improved health outcomes through improved quality-of-care.

    KW - language

    KW - ethnocentrism

    KW - healthcare

    KW - ethnicity

    KW - health literacy

    KW - socioeconomic status

    KW - race

    KW - conversation analysis

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018251138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/IJHRH-12-2015-0040

    DO - 10.1108/IJHRH-12-2015-0040

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 84

    EP - 94

    JO - International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare

    JF - International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare

    SN - 1757-0980

    IS - 2

    ER -