Abstract
Cochlear implantation is considered an effective management option for children diagnosed with auditory neuropathy. It is assumed that this is because, in most cases of auditory neuropathy, the lesion is located at the inner hair cells or the primary afferent synapse, rather than the auditory nerve per se. Previous studies
reporting benefit in cochlear implantation in this population of subjects have assessed benefit using behavioural measures such as speech perception tests. In this study, we have assessed the benefit of cochlear implantation in subjects with AN using objective assessments including electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) and have correlated this with subjective assessments of speech perception. Correlations between objective and subjective assessments demonstrate that the role of electrical stimulation in providing benefit is not simple. We show that there is no correlation between the electrically-evoked ABR and the electrically-evoked CAEP waveforms. Nor is there a correlation between the objective tests and speech perception abilities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Programme and book of abstracts / XX IERASG Biennial Symposium, Bled, Slovenia, June 10-14, 2007 |
Editors | Dušan Butinar |
Place of Publication | Ljubljana |
Publisher | Slovene Society for Clinical Neurophysiology of the Slovene Medical Association |
Pages | 76-76 |
Number of pages | 1 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789616456296 |
Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Event | International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group Biennial Symposium (20th : 2007) - Bled, Slovenia Duration: 10 Jun 2007 → 14 Jun 2007 |
Conference
Conference | International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group Biennial Symposium (20th : 2007) |
---|---|
City | Bled, Slovenia |
Period | 10/06/07 → 14/06/07 |