Cost-effectiveness of nasal high flow versus CPAP for newborn infants in special-care nurseries

Li Huang, Brett J. Manley, Gaston R. B. Arnolda, Louise S. Owen, Ian M. R. Wright, Jann P. Foster, Peter G. Davis, Adam G. Buckmaster, Kim M. Dalziel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Treating respiratory distress in newborns is expensive. We compared the cost-effectiveness of 2 common noninvasive therapies, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and nasal high-flow (nHF), for newborn infants cared for in nontertiary special care nurseries. Methods: The economic evaluation was planned alongside a randomized control trial conducted in 9 Australian special care nurseries. Costs were considered from a hospital perspective until infants were 12 months of age. A total of 754 infants with respiratory distress, born $31 weeks’ gestation and with birth weight $1200 g, <24 hours old, requiring noninvasive respiratory support and/or supplemental oxygen for >1 hour were recruited during 2015–2017. Inpatient costing records were obtained for 753 infants, of whom 676 were included in the per-protocol analysis. Two scenarios were considered: (1) CPAP versus nHF, with infants in the nHF group having “rescue” CPAP backup available (trial scenario); and (2) CPAP versus nHF, as sole primary support (hypothetical scenario). Effectiveness outcomes were rate of endotracheal intubation and transfer to a tertiary-level NICU. Results: As sole primary support, CPAP is more effective and on average cheaper, and thus is superior. However, nHF with back-up CPAP produced equivalent cost and effectiveness results, and there is no reason to make a decision between the 2 treatments on the basis of the cost or effectiveness outcomes. Conclusions: Nontertiary special care nurseries choosing to use only 1 of the modes should choose CPAP. In units with both modes available, using nHF as first-line therapy may be acceptable if there is back-up CPAP.

Original languageEnglish
Article number020438
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalPediatrics
Volume148
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of nasal high flow versus CPAP for newborn infants in special-care nurseries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this