Abstract
Background: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from a societal perspective.
Methods: A partitioned-survival model estimated the costs and cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC over 20 years. Clinical data were derived from the CHOICE-01 trial, and cost and utility inputs were gathered from Yaozh.com, expert interviews, and a nationwide hospital-based survey. Costs were reported in 2022 US dollars, and outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), with a 5% discount rate was applied. Sensitivity, subgroup, and scenario analyses verified the robustness of results.
Results: Toripalimab plus chemotherapy resulted in 3.048 QALYs and a total cost of $60,813, with an ICER of $19,066 per QALY gained, below China’s 3 times GDP per capita threshold ($38,223). Robustness is confirmed through sensitivity, subgroup and scenario analyses.
Conclusions: Toripalimab plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective option for treatment-naive advanced NSCLC compared to chemotherapy alone, providing valuable evidence for clinical and reimbursement decision-making.
Methods: A partitioned-survival model estimated the costs and cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC over 20 years. Clinical data were derived from the CHOICE-01 trial, and cost and utility inputs were gathered from Yaozh.com, expert interviews, and a nationwide hospital-based survey. Costs were reported in 2022 US dollars, and outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), with a 5% discount rate was applied. Sensitivity, subgroup, and scenario analyses verified the robustness of results.
Results: Toripalimab plus chemotherapy resulted in 3.048 QALYs and a total cost of $60,813, with an ICER of $19,066 per QALY gained, below China’s 3 times GDP per capita threshold ($38,223). Robustness is confirmed through sensitivity, subgroup and scenario analyses.
Conclusions: Toripalimab plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective option for treatment-naive advanced NSCLC compared to chemotherapy alone, providing valuable evidence for clinical and reimbursement decision-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 587-596 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 5 Jan 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Keywords
- Toripalimab
- non-small cell lung cancer
- cost-effectiveness
- societal perspective
- China
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China: a societal perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver