Cost-related non-adherence to prescribed medicines: what are physicians' moral duties?

Narcyz Ghinea*, Katrina Hutchison, Mianna Lotz, Wendy A. Rogers

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As the price of pharmaceuticals and biologicals rises so does the number of patients who cannot afford them. In this article, we argue that physicians have a moral duty to help patients access affordable medicines. We offer three grounds to support our argument: (i) the aim of prescribing is to improve health and well-being which can only be realized with secure access to treatment; (ii) there is no morally significant difference between medicines being unavailable and medicines being unaffordable, so the steps physicians are willing to take in the first case should extend to the second; and (iii) as the primary stakeholder with a duty to put the individual patient's interests first, the medical professional has a duty to address cost-barriers to patient care. In articulating this duty, we take account of important epistemic and control conditions that must be met for the attribution of this duty to be justified.

    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages12
    JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
    Early online date18 Apr 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Apr 2024

    Keywords

    • health care delivery
    • moral theory
    • pharmaceutical industry
    • professional ethics
    • professional-patient relationship
    • right to health care

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-related non-adherence to prescribed medicines: what are physicians' moral duties?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this