Cost-related non-adherence to prescribed medicines: what are physicians' moral duties?

Narcyz Ghinea*, Katrina Hutchison, Mianna Lotz, Wendy A. Rogers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As the price of pharmaceuticals and biologicals rises so does the number of patients who cannot afford them. In this article, we argue that physicians have a moral duty to help patients access affordable medicines. We offer three grounds to support our argument: (i) the aim of prescribing is to improve health and well-being which can only be realized with secure access to treatment; (ii) there is no morally significant difference between medicines being unavailable and medicines being unaffordable, so the steps physicians are willing to take in the first case should extend to the second; and (iii) as the primary stakeholder with a duty to put the individual patient's interests first, the medical professional has a duty to address cost-barriers to patient care. In articulating this duty, we take account of important epistemic and control conditions that must be met for the attribution of this duty to be justified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-122
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume25
Issue number8
Early online date18 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • health care delivery
  • moral theory
  • pharmaceutical industry
  • professional ethics
  • professional-patient relationship
  • right to health care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-related non-adherence to prescribed medicines: what are physicians' moral duties?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this