Could there be an empirical test for internalism?

Jeanette Kennett, Cordelia Fine

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In our chapter we argued that the empirical evidence cited by Roskies and other data we referred to do not in fact undermine internalism. In this brief rejoinder to the commentaries by Roskies and Smith, we want to further address the role of empirical evidence in this debate and in so doing clarify the project of our chapter.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMoral psychology
    EditorsWalter Sinnott-Armstrong
    Place of PublicationCambridge, MA
    PublisherMIT Press
    Pages217-226
    ISBN (Print)9780262693554
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Publication series

    NameThe Neuroscience of morality : emotion, disease, and development
    PublisherMIT Press

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Could there be an empirical test for internalism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kennett, J., & Fine, C. (2008). Could there be an empirical test for internalism? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (pp. 217-226). (The Neuroscience of morality : emotion, disease, and development). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.