Counter-interpretations of failure from literature, sociology, and social philosophy

Jocelyn Pixley*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter takes a divergent view compared to commonsensical notions of failure. What is success? Tennessee Williams said success is a 'catastrophe' in the USA, since it means great wealth, luxury and inequalities. Sociologist Robert Merton analysed this US assumption of success, calling it anomie, the acquisitiveness of a 'sick' society. Social philosophers favoured hermeneutics and sociology of knowledge, greatly supported by feminists and blacks. Orthodox economics sealed itself off, claiming the status of natural science, somewhat similar to postmodern individualist opinions. This rejection of social sciences was shown to be 'physics envy' but which served banking and corporate interests. It legitimated mass depressions and thus serious failures, the author's evidence demonstrates.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationRoutledge international handbook of failure
    EditorsAdriana Mica, Mikołaj Pawlak, Anna Horolets, Paweł Kubicki
    Place of PublicationLondon ; New York
    PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
    Chapter22
    Pages313-329
    Number of pages17
    ISBN (Electronic)9781000775648
    ISBN (Print)9780367404048, 9781032371047
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2023

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Counter-interpretations of failure from literature, sociology, and social philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this