Covariation bias for phylogenetic versus ontogenetic fear-relevant stimuli

Susan J. Kennedy, Ronald M. Rapee*, Evalynn J. Mazurski

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the present study, two groups of 21 subjects with either high or low fear of both snakes (or spiders) and damaged electrical outlets/appliances participated in a two phase experiment. After reading a description of an illusory correlation experiment, subjects were asked to imagine themselves participating in it. They rated their expectations for the number of occasions on which slides of snakes, electrical outlets, and flowers would be followed by either a shock, tone, or nothing. As predicted, both high and low-fear subjects reported an expectancy bias for both phylogenetic and ontogenetic fear-relevant stimuli and shock. In the second phase subjects were actually exposed to the random slide/outcome presentation. Only high-fear subjects demonstrated a covariation bias which was specific to phylogenetic fear-relevant slides and shock, indicating all other biases were effectively attenuated.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)415-422
    Number of pages8
    JournalBehaviour Research and Therapy
    Volume35
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 1997

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Covariation bias for phylogenetic versus ontogenetic fear-relevant stimuli'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this