TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-cultural study of conviction subtype Taijin Kyofu
T2 - Proposal and reliability of Nagoya-Osaka diagnostic criteria for social anxiety disorder
AU - Kinoshita, Yoshihiro
AU - Chen, Junwen
AU - Rapee, Ronald M.
AU - Bögels, Susan
AU - Schneier, Franklin R.
AU - Choy, Yujuan
AU - Kwon, Jung Hye
AU - Liu, Xinghua
AU - Schramm, Elisabeth
AU - Chavira, Denise A.
AU - Nakano, Yumi
AU - Watanabe, Norio
AU - Ietzugu, Tetsuji
AU - Ogawa, Sei
AU - Emmelkamp, Paul
AU - Zhang, Jianxue
AU - Kingdon, David
AU - Nagata, Toshihiko
AU - Furukawa, Toshi A.
PY - 2008/4
Y1 - 2008/4
N2 - Conviction subtype Taijin-Kyofu (c-TK) is a subgroup of mental disorder characterized by conviction and strong fear of offending others in social situations. Although the concept of c-TK overlaps with that of social anxiety disorder (SAD), patients with c-TK often may not be diagnosed as such within the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria. We propose the Nagoya-Osaka criteria to amend this situation. This study examined the cross-cultural interrater reliability of the proposed criteria. Eighteen case vignettes of patients with a variety of complaints focused around social anxieties were collected from 6 different countries, and diagnosed by 13 independent raters from various nationalities according to the original DSM-IV and the expanded criteria. The average agreement ratio for the most frequent diagnostic category in each case was 61.5% with DSM-IV and 87.6% with the modified DSM-IV with Nagoya-Osaka criteria (p < 0.001). These findings indicate that the Nagoya-Osaka criteria for SAD can improve interrater reliability of SAD.
AB - Conviction subtype Taijin-Kyofu (c-TK) is a subgroup of mental disorder characterized by conviction and strong fear of offending others in social situations. Although the concept of c-TK overlaps with that of social anxiety disorder (SAD), patients with c-TK often may not be diagnosed as such within the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria. We propose the Nagoya-Osaka criteria to amend this situation. This study examined the cross-cultural interrater reliability of the proposed criteria. Eighteen case vignettes of patients with a variety of complaints focused around social anxieties were collected from 6 different countries, and diagnosed by 13 independent raters from various nationalities according to the original DSM-IV and the expanded criteria. The average agreement ratio for the most frequent diagnostic category in each case was 61.5% with DSM-IV and 87.6% with the modified DSM-IV with Nagoya-Osaka criteria (p < 0.001). These findings indicate that the Nagoya-Osaka criteria for SAD can improve interrater reliability of SAD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42249086806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31816a4952
DO - 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31816a4952
M3 - Article
C2 - 18414125
AN - SCOPUS:42249086806
SN - 0022-3018
VL - 196
SP - 307
EP - 313
JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
IS - 4
ER -