Cue generation and memory construction in direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval

Celia B. Harris*, Akira R. O'Connor, John Sutton

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    50 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Theories of autobiographical memory emphasise effortful, generative search processes in memory retrieval. However recent research suggests that memories are often retrieved directly, without effortful search. We investigated whether direct and generative retrieval differed in the characteristics of memories recalled, or only in terms of retrieval latency. Participants recalled autobiographical memories in response to cue words. For each memory, they reported whether it was retrieved directly or generatively, rated its visuo-spatial perspective, and judged its accompanying recollective experience. Our results indicated that direct retrieval was commonly reported and was faster than generative retrieval, replicating recent findings. The characteristics of directly retrieved memories differed from generatively retrieved memories: directly retrieved memories had higher field perspective ratings and lower observer perspective ratings. However, retrieval mode did not influence recollective experience. We discuss our findings in terms of cue generation and content construction, and the implication for reconstructive models of autobiographical memory.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)204-216
    Number of pages13
    JournalConsciousness and cognition
    Volume33
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015

    Keywords

    • Autobiographical memory
    • Direct retrieval
    • Generative retrieval
    • Memory reconstruction
    • Recollective experience
    • Visuo-spatial perspective

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cue generation and memory construction in direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this