TY - JOUR
T1 - Cuffless blood pressure measuring devices
T2 - review and statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability
AU - Stergiou, George S.
AU - Mukkamala, Ramakrishna
AU - Avolio, Alberto
AU - Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G.
AU - Mieke, Stephan
AU - Murray, Alan
AU - Parati, Gianfranco
AU - Schutte, Aletta E.
AU - Sharman, James E.
AU - Asmar, Roland
AU - McManus, Richard J.
AU - Asayama, Kei
AU - De La Sierra, Alejandro
AU - Head, Geoffrey
AU - Kario, Kazuomi
AU - Kollias, Anastasios
AU - Myers, Martin
AU - Niiranen, Teemu
AU - Ohkubo, Takayoshi
AU - Wang, Jiguang
AU - Wuerzner, Grégoire
AU - O'Brien, Eoin
AU - Kreutz, Reinhold
AU - Palatini, Paolo
AU - Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability of the European Society of Hypertension
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Background: Many cuffless blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are currently on the market claiming that they provide accurate BP measurements. These technologies have considerable potential to improve the awareness, treatment, and management of hypertension. However, recent guidelines by the European Society of Hypertension do not recommend cuffless devices for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Objective: This statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on BP Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability presents the types of cuffless BP technologies, issues in their validation, and recommendations for clinical practice. Statements: Cuffless BP monitors constitute a wide and heterogeneous group of novel technologies and devices with different intended uses. Cuffless BP devices have specific accuracy issues, which render the established validation protocols for cuff BP devices inadequate for their validation. In 2014, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers published a standard for the validation of cuffless BP devices, and the International Organization for Standardization is currently developing another standard. The validation of cuffless devices should address issues related to the need of individual cuff calibration, the stability of measurements post calibration, the ability to track BP changes, and the implementation of machine learning technology. Clinical field investigations may also be considered and issues regarding the clinical implementation of cuffless BP readings should be investigated. Conclusion: Cuffless BP devices have considerable potential for changing the diagnosis and management of hypertension. However, fundamental questions regarding their accuracy, performance, and implementation need to be carefully addressed before they can be recommended for clinical use.
AB - Background: Many cuffless blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are currently on the market claiming that they provide accurate BP measurements. These technologies have considerable potential to improve the awareness, treatment, and management of hypertension. However, recent guidelines by the European Society of Hypertension do not recommend cuffless devices for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Objective: This statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on BP Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability presents the types of cuffless BP technologies, issues in their validation, and recommendations for clinical practice. Statements: Cuffless BP monitors constitute a wide and heterogeneous group of novel technologies and devices with different intended uses. Cuffless BP devices have specific accuracy issues, which render the established validation protocols for cuff BP devices inadequate for their validation. In 2014, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers published a standard for the validation of cuffless BP devices, and the International Organization for Standardization is currently developing another standard. The validation of cuffless devices should address issues related to the need of individual cuff calibration, the stability of measurements post calibration, the ability to track BP changes, and the implementation of machine learning technology. Clinical field investigations may also be considered and issues regarding the clinical implementation of cuffless BP readings should be investigated. Conclusion: Cuffless BP devices have considerable potential for changing the diagnosis and management of hypertension. However, fundamental questions regarding their accuracy, performance, and implementation need to be carefully addressed before they can be recommended for clinical use.
KW - accuracy
KW - calibration
KW - continuous
KW - cuffless blood pressure measurement
KW - cuffless blood pressure monitoring
KW - photoplethysmography
KW - smartwatch
KW - technology
KW - validation
KW - wearable
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135223854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003224
DO - 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003224
M3 - Article
C2 - 35708294
AN - SCOPUS:85135223854
SN - 0263-6352
VL - 40
SP - 1449
EP - 1460
JO - Journal of Hypertension
JF - Journal of Hypertension
IS - 8
ER -