Culture and media

David Carter, Bridget Griffen-Foley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The dynamics shaping culture and media in Australia across the twentieth century emerged in a context defined by both urban concentration and widely dispersed regions: tensions between localism and national integration of production and markets; persistent calls for a national culture or cultural industries; domination by a few large national or multinational operators; and intervention by public institutions in the commercial marketplace. Underpinning all are the complexities of Australia’s place in transnational cultural networks. The domestic market was not large enough to sustain major production industries but it was sufficiently large to be a target for cultural exports such as Hollywood movies and British books. In the early twentieth century, as in the early twenty-first, Australian culture was inevitably a hybridisation of local and external influences, prompting recurrent debates over national values, modernity and ‘Americanisation’. Modernity and nationhood had arrived together, generating anxieties that the nation was both too modern, with no deep traditions of its own, and not modern enough, always lagging behind the great metropolitan centres. Yet even as the ‘true Australia’ was located in the image of a pre-modern bush landscape, Australians were busily engaging with the new modern cultures. The British imperial connection was not merely a conservative force but a means of accessing the new. Modernity at home. In April 1922 the Sydney <italic>Triad</italic> announced its latest issue as ‘a Mary Pickford number’. The Hollywood star featured on the magazine’s cover and in an adoring article. In a published letter to the editors, Pickford claimed she never missed an issue. This episode could be taken as evidence of the lack of a vigorous, independent Australian culture in the decades after Federation. For the pioneering cultural historian Geoffrey Serle, the 1920s were ‘a scurvy period, when Australians seemed content to accept second-rateness’. Following the ‘nationalist surge’ of the 1880s and 1890s, the early twentieth century was marked by ‘a perpetuation of colonial dependence and a curious hesitation in development towards nationhood’.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Commonwealth of Australia
EditorsAlison Bashford, Stuart Macintyre
Place of PublicationCambridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages237-262
Number of pages26
Volume2
ISBN (Electronic)9781107445758
ISBN (Print)9781107011557
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Modernity
Australian Culture
Nationhood
Operator
George W. Bush
Colonies
Nationalists
Hollywood Stars
Premodern
Letters to the Editor
Federation
Hybridization
National Cultures
Localism
Anxiety
Cultural Historians
1920s
1890s
Metropolitan
Americanization

Cite this

Carter, D., & Griffen-Foley, B. (2013). Culture and media. In A. Bashford, & S. Macintyre (Eds.), The Commonwealth of Australia (Vol. 2, pp. 237-262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781107445758.043
Carter, David ; Griffen-Foley, Bridget. / Culture and media. The Commonwealth of Australia. editor / Alison Bashford ; Stuart Macintyre. Vol. 2 Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013. pp. 237-262
@inbook{e147ac24cc9949b3b206eae466c7e793,
title = "Culture and media",
abstract = "The dynamics shaping culture and media in Australia across the twentieth century emerged in a context defined by both urban concentration and widely dispersed regions: tensions between localism and national integration of production and markets; persistent calls for a national culture or cultural industries; domination by a few large national or multinational operators; and intervention by public institutions in the commercial marketplace. Underpinning all are the complexities of Australia’s place in transnational cultural networks. The domestic market was not large enough to sustain major production industries but it was sufficiently large to be a target for cultural exports such as Hollywood movies and British books. In the early twentieth century, as in the early twenty-first, Australian culture was inevitably a hybridisation of local and external influences, prompting recurrent debates over national values, modernity and ‘Americanisation’. Modernity and nationhood had arrived together, generating anxieties that the nation was both too modern, with no deep traditions of its own, and not modern enough, always lagging behind the great metropolitan centres. Yet even as the ‘true Australia’ was located in the image of a pre-modern bush landscape, Australians were busily engaging with the new modern cultures. The British imperial connection was not merely a conservative force but a means of accessing the new. Modernity at home. In April 1922 the Sydney Triad announced its latest issue as ‘a Mary Pickford number’. The Hollywood star featured on the magazine’s cover and in an adoring article. In a published letter to the editors, Pickford claimed she never missed an issue. This episode could be taken as evidence of the lack of a vigorous, independent Australian culture in the decades after Federation. For the pioneering cultural historian Geoffrey Serle, the 1920s were ‘a scurvy period, when Australians seemed content to accept second-rateness’. Following the ‘nationalist surge’ of the 1880s and 1890s, the early twentieth century was marked by ‘a perpetuation of colonial dependence and a curious hesitation in development towards nationhood’.",
author = "David Carter and Bridget Griffen-Foley",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1017/CHO9781107445758.043",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781107011557",
volume = "2",
pages = "237--262",
editor = "Alison Bashford and Stuart Macintyre",
booktitle = "The Commonwealth of Australia",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Carter, D & Griffen-Foley, B 2013, Culture and media. in A Bashford & S Macintyre (eds), The Commonwealth of Australia. vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781107445758.043

Culture and media. / Carter, David; Griffen-Foley, Bridget.

The Commonwealth of Australia. ed. / Alison Bashford; Stuart Macintyre. Vol. 2 Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 237-262.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Culture and media

AU - Carter, David

AU - Griffen-Foley, Bridget

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The dynamics shaping culture and media in Australia across the twentieth century emerged in a context defined by both urban concentration and widely dispersed regions: tensions between localism and national integration of production and markets; persistent calls for a national culture or cultural industries; domination by a few large national or multinational operators; and intervention by public institutions in the commercial marketplace. Underpinning all are the complexities of Australia’s place in transnational cultural networks. The domestic market was not large enough to sustain major production industries but it was sufficiently large to be a target for cultural exports such as Hollywood movies and British books. In the early twentieth century, as in the early twenty-first, Australian culture was inevitably a hybridisation of local and external influences, prompting recurrent debates over national values, modernity and ‘Americanisation’. Modernity and nationhood had arrived together, generating anxieties that the nation was both too modern, with no deep traditions of its own, and not modern enough, always lagging behind the great metropolitan centres. Yet even as the ‘true Australia’ was located in the image of a pre-modern bush landscape, Australians were busily engaging with the new modern cultures. The British imperial connection was not merely a conservative force but a means of accessing the new. Modernity at home. In April 1922 the Sydney Triad announced its latest issue as ‘a Mary Pickford number’. The Hollywood star featured on the magazine’s cover and in an adoring article. In a published letter to the editors, Pickford claimed she never missed an issue. This episode could be taken as evidence of the lack of a vigorous, independent Australian culture in the decades after Federation. For the pioneering cultural historian Geoffrey Serle, the 1920s were ‘a scurvy period, when Australians seemed content to accept second-rateness’. Following the ‘nationalist surge’ of the 1880s and 1890s, the early twentieth century was marked by ‘a perpetuation of colonial dependence and a curious hesitation in development towards nationhood’.

AB - The dynamics shaping culture and media in Australia across the twentieth century emerged in a context defined by both urban concentration and widely dispersed regions: tensions between localism and national integration of production and markets; persistent calls for a national culture or cultural industries; domination by a few large national or multinational operators; and intervention by public institutions in the commercial marketplace. Underpinning all are the complexities of Australia’s place in transnational cultural networks. The domestic market was not large enough to sustain major production industries but it was sufficiently large to be a target for cultural exports such as Hollywood movies and British books. In the early twentieth century, as in the early twenty-first, Australian culture was inevitably a hybridisation of local and external influences, prompting recurrent debates over national values, modernity and ‘Americanisation’. Modernity and nationhood had arrived together, generating anxieties that the nation was both too modern, with no deep traditions of its own, and not modern enough, always lagging behind the great metropolitan centres. Yet even as the ‘true Australia’ was located in the image of a pre-modern bush landscape, Australians were busily engaging with the new modern cultures. The British imperial connection was not merely a conservative force but a means of accessing the new. Modernity at home. In April 1922 the Sydney Triad announced its latest issue as ‘a Mary Pickford number’. The Hollywood star featured on the magazine’s cover and in an adoring article. In a published letter to the editors, Pickford claimed she never missed an issue. This episode could be taken as evidence of the lack of a vigorous, independent Australian culture in the decades after Federation. For the pioneering cultural historian Geoffrey Serle, the 1920s were ‘a scurvy period, when Australians seemed content to accept second-rateness’. Following the ‘nationalist surge’ of the 1880s and 1890s, the early twentieth century was marked by ‘a perpetuation of colonial dependence and a curious hesitation in development towards nationhood’.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941565586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CHO9781107445758.043

DO - 10.1017/CHO9781107445758.043

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781107011557

VL - 2

SP - 237

EP - 262

BT - The Commonwealth of Australia

A2 - Bashford, Alison

A2 - Macintyre, Stuart

PB - Cambridge University Press

CY - Cambridge

ER -

Carter D, Griffen-Foley B. Culture and media. In Bashford A, Macintyre S, editors, The Commonwealth of Australia. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2013. p. 237-262 https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781107445758.043