TY - UNPB
T1 - D-FIT
T2 - a Delphi consensus study to devise a framework of informativeness for clinical trials in digital mental health
AU - O’Dea, Bridianne
AU - Batterham, Philip J.
AU - Vilus, Bojana
AU - Paravastu, Neelesh
AU - Taylor, Mindy
AU - Whitton, Matthew K.
AU - Achilles, Melinda
AU - Subotic-Kerry, Mirjana
PY - 2024/3/18
Y1 - 2024/3/18
N2 - This research project involves an online Delphi study, a multi-step research process designed to measure the general agreement among individuals about key topics. In this Delphi study, we are focussing on measuring the level of agreement on key features of informativeness in digital mental health trials across five stakeholder groups (researchers, consumers, clinicians, policy makers, statisticians/methodologists). In our project, the Delphi study involves participants completing two online anonymous surveys sent up to three weeks apart. The surveys ask participants to rate the importance of several brief statements related to clinical trials in digital mental health. Participants will have the opportunity to provide feedback on these statements and nominate any other features of informativeness that you feel are important. When participants open the second survey, they will see the anonymous results from the first survey, allowing them to reflect on these before providing their responses to the second survey. The research team will then review the responses to determine which statements reached majority agreement of importance and use these to formulate the final framework.
AB - This research project involves an online Delphi study, a multi-step research process designed to measure the general agreement among individuals about key topics. In this Delphi study, we are focussing on measuring the level of agreement on key features of informativeness in digital mental health trials across five stakeholder groups (researchers, consumers, clinicians, policy makers, statisticians/methodologists). In our project, the Delphi study involves participants completing two online anonymous surveys sent up to three weeks apart. The surveys ask participants to rate the importance of several brief statements related to clinical trials in digital mental health. Participants will have the opportunity to provide feedback on these statements and nominate any other features of informativeness that you feel are important. When participants open the second survey, they will see the anonymous results from the first survey, allowing them to reflect on these before providing their responses to the second survey. The research team will then review the responses to determine which statements reached majority agreement of importance and use these to formulate the final framework.
U2 - 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q3M2W
DO - 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q3M2W
M3 - Preprint
T3 - OSF Registries
BT - D-FIT
ER -