Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

'Damn, Channing Tatum can move!': women's accounts of men's bodies and objectification in post-feminist times

Andrea Waling*, Duane Duncan, Steven Angelides, Gary W. Dowsett

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper explores how women think about men's bodies as objects of desire. It reports on one part of a larger qualitative study on men's bodywork practices in contemporary Australia. Drawing on material from three focus groups with 24 Australian women of varying ages, sexual orientations and backgrounds, the paper considers how women experience, understand and reflect on their desire for men and men's bodies. It also explores themes such as the connection women draw between what a man's body looks like and what it can do, how attraction is experienced, the meaning making women engage in as they think about men and men's bodies, and the broader politics of sexuality and objectification that inform their perceptions and ideas. These experiences are set against ideas in post-feminist thinking on women's sexual desire and debates on their sexual empowerment. The paper argues that these women are grappling with tensions between their personal experiences of sexual objectification and a feminist ethics relating to their active and reflexive projects of sexuality.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)455-478
    Number of pages24
    JournalSexualities
    Volume25
    Issue number5-6
    Early online date29 Oct 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

    Keywords

    • sexuality
    • bodies
    • desire
    • objectification
    • post-feminism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''Damn, Channing Tatum can move!': women's accounts of men's bodies and objectification in post-feminist times'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this