Data localisation laws: trade barriers or legitimate responses to cybersecurity risks, or both?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Laws requiring data to be hosted within a particular jurisdiction tend to upset existing ideas about how the Internet should work. Some countries, particularly the USA, have labelled such laws as trade barriers. Other countries, such as Russia and China, have claimed they are pursuing legitimate strategies to protect their citizenry. With a particular focus upon the BRICs, this article aims to make an original contribution to this discourse by synthesising insights from the disciplines of international trade law and internet governance to analyse and separate the rhetoric from the reality of these competing claims. Drawing upon evidence from information leaked by Edward Snowden about the activities of the US National Security Agency, the article argues that underlying these tensions is the battle to retain or reduce the comparative advantage the US has historically enjoyed in economies of scale for its Internet signals intelligence capabilities. Underneath the debate over trade issues, this article argues that data localisation laws are being supported by some countries not only as a means to reduce their comparative disadvantage in Internet data hosting, but also to reduce their comparative disadvantage in Internet signals intelligence.
LanguageEnglish
Pages213–232
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

trade barrier
Internet
Law
trade law
national security
world trade
international law
jurisdiction
rhetoric
Russia
governance
China
economy
discourse
evidence

Cite this

@article{f10107c162984d96baa12f9be3515073,
title = "Data localisation laws: trade barriers or legitimate responses to cybersecurity risks, or both?",
abstract = "Laws requiring data to be hosted within a particular jurisdiction tend to upset existing ideas about how the Internet should work. Some countries, particularly the USA, have labelled such laws as trade barriers. Other countries, such as Russia and China, have claimed they are pursuing legitimate strategies to protect their citizenry. With a particular focus upon the BRICs, this article aims to make an original contribution to this discourse by synthesising insights from the disciplines of international trade law and internet governance to analyse and separate the rhetoric from the reality of these competing claims. Drawing upon evidence from information leaked by Edward Snowden about the activities of the US National Security Agency, the article argues that underlying these tensions is the battle to retain or reduce the comparative advantage the US has historically enjoyed in economies of scale for its Internet signals intelligence capabilities. Underneath the debate over trade issues, this article argues that data localisation laws are being supported by some countries not only as a means to reduce their comparative disadvantage in Internet data hosting, but also to reduce their comparative disadvantage in Internet signals intelligence.",
keywords = "Trade barriers, Cybersecurity, Surveillance",
author = "John Selby",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1093/ijlit/eax010",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "213–232",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Information Technology",
issn = "0967-0769",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Data localisation laws : trade barriers or legitimate responses to cybersecurity risks, or both? / Selby, John.

In: International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 09.2017, p. 213–232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data localisation laws

T2 - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

AU - Selby,John

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Laws requiring data to be hosted within a particular jurisdiction tend to upset existing ideas about how the Internet should work. Some countries, particularly the USA, have labelled such laws as trade barriers. Other countries, such as Russia and China, have claimed they are pursuing legitimate strategies to protect their citizenry. With a particular focus upon the BRICs, this article aims to make an original contribution to this discourse by synthesising insights from the disciplines of international trade law and internet governance to analyse and separate the rhetoric from the reality of these competing claims. Drawing upon evidence from information leaked by Edward Snowden about the activities of the US National Security Agency, the article argues that underlying these tensions is the battle to retain or reduce the comparative advantage the US has historically enjoyed in economies of scale for its Internet signals intelligence capabilities. Underneath the debate over trade issues, this article argues that data localisation laws are being supported by some countries not only as a means to reduce their comparative disadvantage in Internet data hosting, but also to reduce their comparative disadvantage in Internet signals intelligence.

AB - Laws requiring data to be hosted within a particular jurisdiction tend to upset existing ideas about how the Internet should work. Some countries, particularly the USA, have labelled such laws as trade barriers. Other countries, such as Russia and China, have claimed they are pursuing legitimate strategies to protect their citizenry. With a particular focus upon the BRICs, this article aims to make an original contribution to this discourse by synthesising insights from the disciplines of international trade law and internet governance to analyse and separate the rhetoric from the reality of these competing claims. Drawing upon evidence from information leaked by Edward Snowden about the activities of the US National Security Agency, the article argues that underlying these tensions is the battle to retain or reduce the comparative advantage the US has historically enjoyed in economies of scale for its Internet signals intelligence capabilities. Underneath the debate over trade issues, this article argues that data localisation laws are being supported by some countries not only as a means to reduce their comparative disadvantage in Internet data hosting, but also to reduce their comparative disadvantage in Internet signals intelligence.

KW - Trade barriers

KW - Cybersecurity

KW - Surveillance

UR - http://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com/title/1507088597510/211207

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028383886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ijlit/eax010

DO - 10.1093/ijlit/eax010

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 213

EP - 232

JO - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

JF - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

SN - 0967-0769

IS - 3

ER -