Death spiral PIPEs: a reconsideration of the evidence

Karen Benson; Martina Linnenluecke; David Morrison; Sviatoslav Rosov

doi:10.1111/acfi.12535

Death spiral PIPEs: a reconsideration of the evidence

Karen Benson, Martina Linnenluecke^*, David Morrison, Sviatoslav Rosov

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Applied Finance

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We challenge the view that PIPEs lead to unfavourable outcomes for issuing firms. We show that structured PIPEs do not have significant negative CARs when a matched firm benchmark is used for computing CARs and when sample selection bias is taken into account. Indeed, structured PIPEs have significantly higher positive skewness, indicating superior optionality, consistent with the real option argument. We also show that the 2002 intervention by the Securities and Exchange Corporation (SEC) has led to unintended consequences, with the substitution of ‘mom and pop’ investors for hedge fund investors in the structured PIPE market.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	4175-4194
Number of pages	20
Journal	Accounting & Finance
Volume	60
Issue number	4
Early online date	10 Sep 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12535
Publication status	Published - Dec 2020

Keywords

Cumulative abnormal returns
Matched firm benchmark
Private investments in public equity
Securities and exchange commission
Structured PIPEs

Access to Document

10.1111/acfi.12535

Cite this

@article{aaf57e2fdb8843788c0e76f32cd327cf,

title = "Death spiral PIPEs: a reconsideration of the evidence",

abstract = "We challenge the view that PIPEs lead to unfavourable outcomes for issuing firms. We show that structured PIPEs do not have significant negative CARs when a matched firm benchmark is used for computing CARs and when sample selection bias is taken into account. Indeed, structured PIPEs have significantly higher positive skewness, indicating superior optionality, consistent with the real option argument. We also show that the 2002 intervention by the Securities and Exchange Corporation (SEC) has led to unintended consequences, with the substitution of {\textquoteleft}mom and pop{\textquoteright} investors for hedge fund investors in the structured PIPE market.",

keywords = "Cumulative abnormal returns, Matched firm benchmark, Private investments in public equity, Securities and exchange commission, Structured PIPEs",

author = "Karen Benson and Martina Linnenluecke and David Morrison and Sviatoslav Rosov",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1111/acfi.12535",

language = "English",

volume = "60",

pages = "4175--4194",

journal = "Accounting & Finance",

issn = "0810-5391",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Death spiral PIPEs

T2 - a reconsideration of the evidence

AU - Benson, Karen

AU - Linnenluecke, Martina

AU - Morrison, David

AU - Rosov, Sviatoslav

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - We challenge the view that PIPEs lead to unfavourable outcomes for issuing firms. We show that structured PIPEs do not have significant negative CARs when a matched firm benchmark is used for computing CARs and when sample selection bias is taken into account. Indeed, structured PIPEs have significantly higher positive skewness, indicating superior optionality, consistent with the real option argument. We also show that the 2002 intervention by the Securities and Exchange Corporation (SEC) has led to unintended consequences, with the substitution of ‘mom and pop’ investors for hedge fund investors in the structured PIPE market.

AB - We challenge the view that PIPEs lead to unfavourable outcomes for issuing firms. We show that structured PIPEs do not have significant negative CARs when a matched firm benchmark is used for computing CARs and when sample selection bias is taken into account. Indeed, structured PIPEs have significantly higher positive skewness, indicating superior optionality, consistent with the real option argument. We also show that the 2002 intervention by the Securities and Exchange Corporation (SEC) has led to unintended consequences, with the substitution of ‘mom and pop’ investors for hedge fund investors in the structured PIPE market.

KW - Cumulative abnormal returns

KW - Matched firm benchmark

KW - Private investments in public equity

KW - Securities and exchange commission

KW - Structured PIPEs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072077075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP160103425

U2 - 10.1111/acfi.12535

DO - 10.1111/acfi.12535

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072077075

VL - 60

SP - 4175

EP - 4194

JO - Accounting & Finance

JF - Accounting & Finance

SN - 0810-5391

IS - 4

ER -

Death spiral PIPEs: a reconsideration of the evidence

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Australia's Climate Strategy and Positioning for the Clean Tech Revolution

Cite this

Death spiral PIPEs: a reconsideration of the evidence

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

Australia's Climate Strategy and Positioning for the Clean Tech Revolution

Cite this