Decision-making of municipal urban forest managers through the lens of governance

Camilo Ordóñez*, Caragh G. Threlfall, Stephen J. Livesley, Dave Kendal, Richard A. Fuller, Melanie Davern, Rodney van der Ree, Dieter F. Hochuli

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Awareness of the benefits of urban trees has led many cities to develop ambitious targets to increase tree numbers and canopy cover. Policy instruments that guide the planning of cities recognize the need for new governance arrangements to implement this agenda. Urban forests are greatly influenced by the decisions of municipal managers, but there is currently no clear understanding of how municipal managers find support to implement their decisions via new governance arrangements. To fill this knowledge gap, we collected empirical data through interviews with 23 urban forest municipal managers in 12 local governments in Greater Melbourne and regional Victoria, Australia, and analysed these data using qualitative interpretative methods through a governance lens. The goal of this was to understand the issues and challenges, stakeholders, resources, processes, and rules behind the decision-making of municipal managers. Municipal managers said that urban densification and expansion were making it difficult for them to implement their strategies to increase tree numbers and canopy cover. The coordination of stakeholders was more important for managers to find support to implement their decisions than having a bigger budget. The views of the public or wider community and a municipal government culture of risk aversion were also making it difficult for municipal managers to implement their strategies. Decision-making priorities and processes were not the same across urban centres. Lack of space to grow trees in new developments, excessive tree removal, and public consultation, were ideas more frequently raised in inner urban centres, while urban expansion, increased active use of greenspaces, and lack of data/information about tree assets were concerns for outer and regional centres. Nonetheless, inter-departmental coordination was a common theme shared among all cities. Strengthening coordination processes is an important way for local governments to overcome these barriers and effectively implement their urban forest strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)136-147
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume104
Early online date12 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Municipal government
  • Urban planning
  • Urban forest management
  • Urban greenspace
  • Urban forest governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decision-making of municipal urban forest managers through the lens of governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this