Decreased food intake as a fecundity-dependent cost of reproduction in keelback snakes (Tropidonophis mairii, Colubridae)

Gregory Paul Brown*, Richard Shine

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The physical burden of pregnancy may render females slower and less able to evade predation, favouring a reduction in feeding in order to avoid a reduction in survivorship. Life-history theory predicts that an organism's optimal level of investment into reproduction depends upon whether or not the associated 'costs' (such as a decrease in rate of feeding) increase with higher fecundity. Anorexia during pregnancy is widespread among snakes, but there are few field data on fecundity-dependence of such costs. Over a 23-year period, we recorded reproductive condition and feeding status (based on palpation and production of faeces) for 3778 captures of free-ranging female natricine colubrid snakes (keelbacks, Tropidonophis mairii) in tropical Australia. Pregnancy reduced feeding rates, and that decrease was greatest for females with higher reproductive investment (clutch mass relative to maternal mass). Our long-term data provide the first clear-cut evidence of fecundity-dependent costs of reproduction in free-ranging snakes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number241831
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Volume12
Issue number4
Early online date9 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • life-history evolution
  • Natricinae
  • reproductive effort
  • tropical ecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decreased food intake as a fecundity-dependent cost of reproduction in keelback snakes (Tropidonophis mairii, Colubridae)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this