Deep learning system outperforms clinicians in identifying optic disc abnormalities

Caroline Vasseneix, Simon Nusinovici, Xinxing Xu, Jeong Min Hwang, Steffen Hamann, John J. Chen, Jing Liang Loo, Leonard Milea, Kenneth B. K. Tan, Daniel S. W. Ting, Yong Liu, Nancy J. Newman, Valerie Biousse, Tien Ying Wong, Dan Milea*, Raymond P. Najjar, BONSAI (Brain and Optic Nerve Study with Artificial Intelligence) Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The examination of the optic nerve head (optic disc) is mandatory in patients with headache, hypertension, or any neurological symptoms, yet it is rarely or poorly performed in general clinics. We recently developed a brain and optic nerve study with artificial intelligence-deep learning system (BONSAI-DLS) capable of accurately detecting optic disc abnormalities including papilledema (swelling due to elevated intracranial pressure) on digital fundus photographs with a comparable classification performance to expert neuro-ophthalmologists, but its performance compared to first-line clinicians remains unknown. Methods: In this international, cross-sectional multicenter study, the DLS, trained on 14,341 fundus photographs, was tested on a retrospectively collected convenience sample of 800 photographs (400 normal optic discs, 201 papilledema and 199 other abnormalities) from 454 patients with a robust ground truth diagnosis provided by the referring expert neuro-ophthalmologists. The areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves were calculated for the BONSAI-DLS. Error rates, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the algorithm were compared with those of 30 clinicians with or without ophthalmic training (6 general ophthalmologists, 6 optometrists, 6 neurologists, 6 internists, 6 emergency department [ED] physicians) who graded the same testing set of images. Results: With an error rate of 15.3%, the DLS outperformed all clinicians (average error rates 24.4%, 24.8%, 38.2%, 44.8%, 47.9% for general ophthalmologists, optometrists, neurologists, internists and ED physicians, respectively) in the overall classification of optic disc appearance. The DLS displayed significantly higher accuracies than 100%, 86.7% and 93.3% of clinicians (n = 30) for the classification of papilledema, normal, and other disc abnormalities, respectively. Conclusions: The performance of the BONSAI-DLS to classify optic discs on fundus photographs was superior to that of clinicians with or without ophthalmic training. A trained DLS may offer valuable diagnostic aid to clinicians from various clinical settings for the screening of optic disc abnormalities harboring potentially sight- or life-threatening neurological conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-167
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deep learning system outperforms clinicians in identifying optic disc abnormalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this