Defining the conversation about Shari'a: Representations in Australian newspapers

Adam Possamai*, Bryan S. Turner, Joshua Roose, Selda Dagistanli, Malcolm Voyce

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Debates about Shari'a law and legal pluralism have come to the fore of political discourse in many western multicultural societies including Australia. The mass media, in particular newspapers, have been active in reporting on Shari'a related news items and in doing so, have made a significant contribution to shaping political debate across western nations from governmental to grassroots levels. Understanding how newspapers report on Shari'a will provide important insights into how political discourse about Islam, western Muslims and Shari'a is formed. Utilizing the example of newspapers in Sydney, Australia, this article draws upon methodologies used to analyse the negative portrayals of new religious movements in the press. The article aims to analyse the way that Shari'a has been reported in key newspapers in Sydney over the last five years. It explores a variety of issues influencing the reporting of Shari'a including reporting of Shari'a at the local and international levels, the division between 'good' Shari'a (Islamic finance) and 'bad' Shari'a (family and criminal law) and differences between newspapers and media owners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)626-645
Number of pages20
JournalCurrent Sociology
Volume61
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Defining the conversation about Shari'a: Representations in Australian newspapers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this