Dependency work: a critical exploration of Kittay's perspective on care as a relationship of power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The emergence of a specialised field of care research is a relatively recent development, owing much to feminist scholarship and the increasing prevalence of women in the public domain. This paper brieflY outlines two of the most influential approaches to the more general field of care research, comparing them with research on professional relationships in formal health care settings. While gender operates as an explanatory factor in each of these approaches, issues of power and domination, which feature strongly in the health sociology literature, are largely avoided in the research on care. Kittay's approach to the theory and analysis of care is a notable exception. Using her recent work as a central focus, this paper explores the social position of care givers and receivers. Examining the nature of power within and surrounding care relationships, Kittay makes an important distinction between the inequality of power and the exertion of domination. Her argument has much to offer sociological research in the field of care, but her avoidance, and at times, confusing use of the concept of 'care', and of the terms 'power' and 'dependency', present some difficulties. To clarify the potential of her contribution, a critique is offered which compares her approach to the analyses of power by Lukes and Foucault.
LanguageEnglish
Pages146-160
Number of pages15
JournalHealth Sociology Review
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Research
domination
Sociology
Public Sector
Caregivers
Dependency (Psychology)
Power (Psychology)
social position
Delivery of Health Care
social research
Health
sociology
recipient
health care
gender
health

Keywords

  • sociology
  • care
  • dependency
  • power
  • body, the
  • ethics of care

Cite this

@article{f430d889f370422486527fb114df2189,
title = "Dependency work: a critical exploration of Kittay's perspective on care as a relationship of power",
abstract = "The emergence of a specialised field of care research is a relatively recent development, owing much to feminist scholarship and the increasing prevalence of women in the public domain. This paper brieflY outlines two of the most influential approaches to the more general field of care research, comparing them with research on professional relationships in formal health care settings. While gender operates as an explanatory factor in each of these approaches, issues of power and domination, which feature strongly in the health sociology literature, are largely avoided in the research on care. Kittay's approach to the theory and analysis of care is a notable exception. Using her recent work as a central focus, this paper explores the social position of care givers and receivers. Examining the nature of power within and surrounding care relationships, Kittay makes an important distinction between the inequality of power and the exertion of domination. Her argument has much to offer sociological research in the field of care, but her avoidance, and at times, confusing use of the concept of 'care', and of the terms 'power' and 'dependency', present some difficulties. To clarify the potential of her contribution, a critique is offered which compares her approach to the analyses of power by Lukes and Foucault.",
keywords = "sociology, care, dependency, power, body, the, ethics of care",
author = "Michael Fine",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.5172/hesr.14.2.146",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "146--160",
journal = "Health Sociology Review",
issn = "1446-1242",
publisher = "eContent Management",
number = "2",

}

Dependency work : a critical exploration of Kittay's perspective on care as a relationship of power. / Fine, Michael.

In: Health Sociology Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2005, p. 146-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dependency work

T2 - Health Sociology Review

AU - Fine, Michael

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The emergence of a specialised field of care research is a relatively recent development, owing much to feminist scholarship and the increasing prevalence of women in the public domain. This paper brieflY outlines two of the most influential approaches to the more general field of care research, comparing them with research on professional relationships in formal health care settings. While gender operates as an explanatory factor in each of these approaches, issues of power and domination, which feature strongly in the health sociology literature, are largely avoided in the research on care. Kittay's approach to the theory and analysis of care is a notable exception. Using her recent work as a central focus, this paper explores the social position of care givers and receivers. Examining the nature of power within and surrounding care relationships, Kittay makes an important distinction between the inequality of power and the exertion of domination. Her argument has much to offer sociological research in the field of care, but her avoidance, and at times, confusing use of the concept of 'care', and of the terms 'power' and 'dependency', present some difficulties. To clarify the potential of her contribution, a critique is offered which compares her approach to the analyses of power by Lukes and Foucault.

AB - The emergence of a specialised field of care research is a relatively recent development, owing much to feminist scholarship and the increasing prevalence of women in the public domain. This paper brieflY outlines two of the most influential approaches to the more general field of care research, comparing them with research on professional relationships in formal health care settings. While gender operates as an explanatory factor in each of these approaches, issues of power and domination, which feature strongly in the health sociology literature, are largely avoided in the research on care. Kittay's approach to the theory and analysis of care is a notable exception. Using her recent work as a central focus, this paper explores the social position of care givers and receivers. Examining the nature of power within and surrounding care relationships, Kittay makes an important distinction between the inequality of power and the exertion of domination. Her argument has much to offer sociological research in the field of care, but her avoidance, and at times, confusing use of the concept of 'care', and of the terms 'power' and 'dependency', present some difficulties. To clarify the potential of her contribution, a critique is offered which compares her approach to the analyses of power by Lukes and Foucault.

KW - sociology

KW - care

KW - dependency

KW - power

KW - body, the

KW - ethics of care

U2 - 10.5172/hesr.14.2.146

DO - 10.5172/hesr.14.2.146

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 146

EP - 160

JO - Health Sociology Review

JF - Health Sociology Review

SN - 1446-1242

IS - 2

ER -