Detaining the usual suspects: charting the use of segregated settings in New South Wales government schools, Australia

Linda J. Graham*, Naomi Sweller, Penny van Bergen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    28 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article examines the increase in segregated placements in the New South Wales government school sector. Using disaggregated enrolment data, it points to the growing overrepresentation of boys in special schools and classes, particularly those of a certain age in certain support categories. In the discussion that follows, the authors question the role of special education in the development of new and additional forms of being 'at risk'. In effect, they invert the traditional concept by asking: who is at risk of what? In focusing on the containment of risk, are modern practices of diagnosis and segregation perpetuating risks that already disproportionately affect certain groups of individuals? Do these perceptions of and responses to risk in local schools now place these students at greater personal risk of school failure and a future marked by social exclusion? And, finally, is that risk worth the cost?.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)234-248
    Number of pages15
    JournalContemporary Issues in Early Childhood
    Volume11
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright the Publisher [2010]. The original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.3.234. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author and according to publisher conditions. For further reproduction rights please contact the publisher at http://www.symposium-journals.co.uk/.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Detaining the usual suspects: charting the use of segregated settings in New South Wales government schools, Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this