TY - JOUR
T1 - Determinants of bus rapid transit (BRT) system revenue and effectiveness – A global benchmarking exercise
AU - Merkert, Rico
AU - Mulley, Corinne
AU - Hakim, Md Mahbubul
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Bus rapid transit systems (BRT) have evolved in all shapes and sizes around the world in the last 30 years motivated by providing greater efficiency and value for money than potential alternatives. This paper aims to explore and compare the effectiveness (including its determinants) and revenue potential of 58 BRT systems globally. A key research question for this paper is to what extent there is a trade-off between long term capital expenditure and short term operating cost. The results suggest that BRT systems located in developing countries or countries that have high population densities are successful in generating higher revenues per passenger and unit of input than their conventional bus counterparts but are from a community perspective not more cost effective in doing so. Better BRT standards and hence higher capital expenditure, while significantly increasing patronage and input effectiveness do not have a significant impact on either yields or cost effectiveness. In contrast, public ownership and the number of stations are on average associated with higher cost effectiveness scores.
AB - Bus rapid transit systems (BRT) have evolved in all shapes and sizes around the world in the last 30 years motivated by providing greater efficiency and value for money than potential alternatives. This paper aims to explore and compare the effectiveness (including its determinants) and revenue potential of 58 BRT systems globally. A key research question for this paper is to what extent there is a trade-off between long term capital expenditure and short term operating cost. The results suggest that BRT systems located in developing countries or countries that have high population densities are successful in generating higher revenues per passenger and unit of input than their conventional bus counterparts but are from a community perspective not more cost effective in doing so. Better BRT standards and hence higher capital expenditure, while significantly increasing patronage and input effectiveness do not have a significant impact on either yields or cost effectiveness. In contrast, public ownership and the number of stations are on average associated with higher cost effectiveness scores.
KW - Benchmarking
KW - BRT
KW - DEA
KW - Effective bus service operation
KW - Performance measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034053192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85034053192
VL - 106
SP - 75
EP - 88
JO - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice
JF - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice
SN - 0965-8564
ER -