Determining responsiveness and meaningful changes for the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways

Andrew James Price*, Reuben Ogollah, Sujin Kang, Elaine Hay, Karen L. Barker, Elena Benedetto, Stephanie Smith, James Smith, James B. Galloway, Benjamin Ellis, Jonathan Rees, Sion Glyn-Jones, David Beard, Ray Fitzpatrick, Jonathan C. Hill

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: We have previously developed and validated the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways, showing encouraging psychometric test results. The objective of this study was to determine the responsiveness of MSK-HQ following MSK treatments and to determine the minimally important change (MIC). Setting: We collected data in four cohorts from community physiotherapy and secondary-care orthopaedic hip, knee and shoulder clinics. Participants: 592 individuals were recruited; 210 patients treated with physiotherapy for a range of MSK conditions in primary care; 150 patients undergoing hip replacement, 150 patients undergoing knee replacement and 82 undergoing shoulder surgery in secondary care. Outcome measures: Preoperative data were collected including the MSK-HQ, European Quality of Life-5D (EQ-5D) and the OHS, OKS or OSS in each joint-specific group. The same scores, together with anchor questions, were collected postintervention at 3 months for the physiotherapy group and 6 months for all others. Following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines, responsiveness was assessed using correlation between scores and the MIC was calculated for the entire cohort using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: The MSK-HQ demonstrated strong correlation (R=0.73) with EQ-5D across the entire cohort and with each of the joint-specific Oxford scores (hip R=0.87, knee R=0.92 and shoulder R=0.77). Moderate correlation was seen between MSK-HQ and EQ-5D across each individual group (R value range 0.60-0.68), apart from the hip group where correlation was strong (R=0.77). The effect size with MSK-HQ was 0.93, in the entire cohort, double that measured with EQ-5D (0.43). In all subgroups, MSK-HQ measured a greater treatment effect compared with EQ-5D. The MIC is 5.5 (95% CI 2.7 to 8.3). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the MSK-HQ questionnaire is responsive to change across a range of musculoskeletal conditions, supporting its use as a generic MSK measurement instrument.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere025357
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • minimally important change
  • MSK-HQ
  • musculoskeletal
  • musculoskeletal disorders
  • patient reported outcome
  • responsiveness

Cite this