Detrended fluctuation analysis detects altered coordination of running gait in athletes following a heavy period of training

Clint R. Bellenger, John B. Arnold, Jonathan D. Buckley, Dominic Thewlis, Joel T. Fuller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether functional overreaching affects locomotor system behaviour when running at fixed relative intensities and if any effects were associated with changes in running performance. Design: Prospective intervention study. Methods: Ten trained male runners completed three training blocks in a fixed order. Training consisted of one week of light training (baseline), two weeks of heavy training designed to induce functional overreaching, and ten days of light taper training designed to allow athletes to recover from, and adapt to, the heavy training. Locomotor behaviour, 5-km time trial performance, and subjective reports of training status (Daily Analysis of Life Demands for Athletes (DALDA) questionnaire) were assessed at the completion of each training block. Locomotor behaviour was assessed using detrended fluctuation analysis of stride intervals during running at speeds corresponding to 65% and 85% of maximum heart rate (HRmax) at baseline. Results: Time trial performance (effect size ±95% confidence interval (ES): 0.16 ± 0.06; p < 0.001), locomotor behaviour at 65% HRmax (ES: −1.12 ± 0.95; p = 0.026), and DALDA (ES: 2.55 ± 0.80; p < 0.001) were all detrimentally affected by the heavy training. Time trial performance improved relative to baseline after the taper (ES: −0.16 ± 0.10; p = 0.003) but locomotor behaviour at 65% HRmax (ES: −1.18 ± 1.17; p = 0.048) and DALDA (ES: 0.92 ± 0.90; p = 0.045) remained impaired. Conclusions: Locomotor behaviour during running at 65% HRmax was impaired by functional overreaching and remained impaired after a 10-day taper, despite improved running performance. Locomotor changes may increase injury risk and should be considered within athlete monitoring programs independently of performance changes.

LanguageEnglish
Pages294-299
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Gait
Athletes
Light
Heart Rate
Prospective Studies
Confidence Intervals
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Athletic injuries
  • Athletic performance
  • Fatigue
  • Locomotion
  • Long-range correlations
  • Overtraining

Cite this

Bellenger, Clint R. ; Arnold, John B. ; Buckley, Jonathan D. ; Thewlis, Dominic ; Fuller, Joel T. / Detrended fluctuation analysis detects altered coordination of running gait in athletes following a heavy period of training. In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2019 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 294-299.
@article{c49938acc3c74d9cb9963da0ef7e293d,
title = "Detrended fluctuation analysis detects altered coordination of running gait in athletes following a heavy period of training",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate whether functional overreaching affects locomotor system behaviour when running at fixed relative intensities and if any effects were associated with changes in running performance. Design: Prospective intervention study. Methods: Ten trained male runners completed three training blocks in a fixed order. Training consisted of one week of light training (baseline), two weeks of heavy training designed to induce functional overreaching, and ten days of light taper training designed to allow athletes to recover from, and adapt to, the heavy training. Locomotor behaviour, 5-km time trial performance, and subjective reports of training status (Daily Analysis of Life Demands for Athletes (DALDA) questionnaire) were assessed at the completion of each training block. Locomotor behaviour was assessed using detrended fluctuation analysis of stride intervals during running at speeds corresponding to 65{\%} and 85{\%} of maximum heart rate (HRmax) at baseline. Results: Time trial performance (effect size ±95{\%} confidence interval (ES): 0.16 ± 0.06; p < 0.001), locomotor behaviour at 65{\%} HRmax (ES: −1.12 ± 0.95; p = 0.026), and DALDA (ES: 2.55 ± 0.80; p < 0.001) were all detrimentally affected by the heavy training. Time trial performance improved relative to baseline after the taper (ES: −0.16 ± 0.10; p = 0.003) but locomotor behaviour at 65{\%} HRmax (ES: −1.18 ± 1.17; p = 0.048) and DALDA (ES: 0.92 ± 0.90; p = 0.045) remained impaired. Conclusions: Locomotor behaviour during running at 65{\%} HRmax was impaired by functional overreaching and remained impaired after a 10-day taper, despite improved running performance. Locomotor changes may increase injury risk and should be considered within athlete monitoring programs independently of performance changes.",
keywords = "Athletic injuries, Athletic performance, Fatigue, Locomotion, Long-range correlations, Overtraining",
author = "Bellenger, {Clint R.} and Arnold, {John B.} and Buckley, {Jonathan D.} and Dominic Thewlis and Fuller, {Joel T.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2018.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "294--299",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Detrended fluctuation analysis detects altered coordination of running gait in athletes following a heavy period of training. / Bellenger, Clint R.; Arnold, John B.; Buckley, Jonathan D.; Thewlis, Dominic; Fuller, Joel T.

In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 22, No. 3, 03.2019, p. 294-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detrended fluctuation analysis detects altered coordination of running gait in athletes following a heavy period of training

AU - Bellenger, Clint R.

AU - Arnold, John B.

AU - Buckley, Jonathan D.

AU - Thewlis, Dominic

AU - Fuller, Joel T.

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Objectives: To investigate whether functional overreaching affects locomotor system behaviour when running at fixed relative intensities and if any effects were associated with changes in running performance. Design: Prospective intervention study. Methods: Ten trained male runners completed three training blocks in a fixed order. Training consisted of one week of light training (baseline), two weeks of heavy training designed to induce functional overreaching, and ten days of light taper training designed to allow athletes to recover from, and adapt to, the heavy training. Locomotor behaviour, 5-km time trial performance, and subjective reports of training status (Daily Analysis of Life Demands for Athletes (DALDA) questionnaire) were assessed at the completion of each training block. Locomotor behaviour was assessed using detrended fluctuation analysis of stride intervals during running at speeds corresponding to 65% and 85% of maximum heart rate (HRmax) at baseline. Results: Time trial performance (effect size ±95% confidence interval (ES): 0.16 ± 0.06; p < 0.001), locomotor behaviour at 65% HRmax (ES: −1.12 ± 0.95; p = 0.026), and DALDA (ES: 2.55 ± 0.80; p < 0.001) were all detrimentally affected by the heavy training. Time trial performance improved relative to baseline after the taper (ES: −0.16 ± 0.10; p = 0.003) but locomotor behaviour at 65% HRmax (ES: −1.18 ± 1.17; p = 0.048) and DALDA (ES: 0.92 ± 0.90; p = 0.045) remained impaired. Conclusions: Locomotor behaviour during running at 65% HRmax was impaired by functional overreaching and remained impaired after a 10-day taper, despite improved running performance. Locomotor changes may increase injury risk and should be considered within athlete monitoring programs independently of performance changes.

AB - Objectives: To investigate whether functional overreaching affects locomotor system behaviour when running at fixed relative intensities and if any effects were associated with changes in running performance. Design: Prospective intervention study. Methods: Ten trained male runners completed three training blocks in a fixed order. Training consisted of one week of light training (baseline), two weeks of heavy training designed to induce functional overreaching, and ten days of light taper training designed to allow athletes to recover from, and adapt to, the heavy training. Locomotor behaviour, 5-km time trial performance, and subjective reports of training status (Daily Analysis of Life Demands for Athletes (DALDA) questionnaire) were assessed at the completion of each training block. Locomotor behaviour was assessed using detrended fluctuation analysis of stride intervals during running at speeds corresponding to 65% and 85% of maximum heart rate (HRmax) at baseline. Results: Time trial performance (effect size ±95% confidence interval (ES): 0.16 ± 0.06; p < 0.001), locomotor behaviour at 65% HRmax (ES: −1.12 ± 0.95; p = 0.026), and DALDA (ES: 2.55 ± 0.80; p < 0.001) were all detrimentally affected by the heavy training. Time trial performance improved relative to baseline after the taper (ES: −0.16 ± 0.10; p = 0.003) but locomotor behaviour at 65% HRmax (ES: −1.18 ± 1.17; p = 0.048) and DALDA (ES: 0.92 ± 0.90; p = 0.045) remained impaired. Conclusions: Locomotor behaviour during running at 65% HRmax was impaired by functional overreaching and remained impaired after a 10-day taper, despite improved running performance. Locomotor changes may increase injury risk and should be considered within athlete monitoring programs independently of performance changes.

KW - Athletic injuries

KW - Athletic performance

KW - Fatigue

KW - Locomotion

KW - Long-range correlations

KW - Overtraining

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053148794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 294

EP - 299

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

T2 - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 3

ER -