Detriments to post-bleaching recovery of corals

T. R. McClanahan, J. Maina, C. J. Starger, P. Herron-Perez, E. Dusek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Predicting the response of coral reefs to large-scale mortality induced by climate change will depend greatly on the factors that influence recovery after bleaching events. We experimentally transplanted hard corals from a shallow reef with highly variable seawater temperature (23-36°C) to three unfished marine parks and three fished reefs with variable coral predator abundance and benthic cover. The transplanted corals were fragmented colonies collected from a reef that was relatively undisturbed by the 1997-1998 warm-water temperature anomaly, one of the most extreme thermal events of the past century, and it was assumed that they would represent corals likely to succeed in the future temperature environment. We examined the effects of four taxa, two fragment sizes, an acclimation period, benthic cover components, predators and tourists on the survival of the coral fragments. We found the lowest survival of transplants occurred in the unfished marine parks and this could be attributed to predation and not tourist damage. The density of small coral recruits approximately 6 months after the spawning season was generally moderate (~40-60/m2), and not different on fished and unfished reefs. Coral recovery between 1998 and 2002 was variable (0-25%), low (mean of 6.5%), and not different between fished and unfished reefs. There was high variability in coral mortality among the three unfished areas despite low variation in estimates of predator biomass, with the highest predation occurring in the Malindi MNP, a site with high coralline algal cover. Stepwise multiple regression analysis with 14 variables of coral predators and substratum showed that coralline algae was positively, and turf algae negatively associated with mortality of the transplants, with all other variables being statistically insignificant. This suggests that alternate food resources and predator choices are more important than predator biomass in determining coral survival. Nonetheless, large predatory fish in areas dominated by coralline algae may considerably retard recovery of eurythermal corals. This will not necessarily retard total hard coral recovery, as other more predator-tolerant taxa can recover. Based on the results, global climate change will not necessarily favor eurythermal over stenothermal coral taxa in remote or unfished reefs, where predation is a major cause of coral mortality.

LanguageEnglish
Pages230-246
Number of pages17
JournalCoral Reefs
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

bleaching
corals
coral
algae
reefs
predator
reef
predators
mortality
coralline alga
predation
marine park
tourists
climate change
biomass
lawns and turf
warm water
acclimation
temperature anomaly
coral reefs

Cite this

McClanahan, T. R., Maina, J., Starger, C. J., Herron-Perez, P., & Dusek, E. (2005). Detriments to post-bleaching recovery of corals. Coral Reefs, 24(2), 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-004-0471-1
McClanahan, T. R. ; Maina, J. ; Starger, C. J. ; Herron-Perez, P. ; Dusek, E. / Detriments to post-bleaching recovery of corals. In: Coral Reefs. 2005 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 230-246.
@article{e7e0b63e3046447295805c3133c1044b,
title = "Detriments to post-bleaching recovery of corals",
abstract = "Predicting the response of coral reefs to large-scale mortality induced by climate change will depend greatly on the factors that influence recovery after bleaching events. We experimentally transplanted hard corals from a shallow reef with highly variable seawater temperature (23-36°C) to three unfished marine parks and three fished reefs with variable coral predator abundance and benthic cover. The transplanted corals were fragmented colonies collected from a reef that was relatively undisturbed by the 1997-1998 warm-water temperature anomaly, one of the most extreme thermal events of the past century, and it was assumed that they would represent corals likely to succeed in the future temperature environment. We examined the effects of four taxa, two fragment sizes, an acclimation period, benthic cover components, predators and tourists on the survival of the coral fragments. We found the lowest survival of transplants occurred in the unfished marine parks and this could be attributed to predation and not tourist damage. The density of small coral recruits approximately 6 months after the spawning season was generally moderate (~40-60/m2), and not different on fished and unfished reefs. Coral recovery between 1998 and 2002 was variable (0-25{\%}), low (mean of 6.5{\%}), and not different between fished and unfished reefs. There was high variability in coral mortality among the three unfished areas despite low variation in estimates of predator biomass, with the highest predation occurring in the Malindi MNP, a site with high coralline algal cover. Stepwise multiple regression analysis with 14 variables of coral predators and substratum showed that coralline algae was positively, and turf algae negatively associated with mortality of the transplants, with all other variables being statistically insignificant. This suggests that alternate food resources and predator choices are more important than predator biomass in determining coral survival. Nonetheless, large predatory fish in areas dominated by coralline algae may considerably retard recovery of eurythermal corals. This will not necessarily retard total hard coral recovery, as other more predator-tolerant taxa can recover. Based on the results, global climate change will not necessarily favor eurythermal over stenothermal coral taxa in remote or unfished reefs, where predation is a major cause of coral mortality.",
author = "McClanahan, {T. R.} and J. Maina and Starger, {C. J.} and P. Herron-Perez and E. Dusek",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00338-004-0471-1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "230--246",
journal = "Coral Reefs",
issn = "0722-4028",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "2",

}

McClanahan, TR, Maina, J, Starger, CJ, Herron-Perez, P & Dusek, E 2005, 'Detriments to post-bleaching recovery of corals', Coral Reefs, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-004-0471-1

Detriments to post-bleaching recovery of corals. / McClanahan, T. R.; Maina, J.; Starger, C. J.; Herron-Perez, P.; Dusek, E.

In: Coral Reefs, Vol. 24, No. 2, 06.2005, p. 230-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detriments to post-bleaching recovery of corals

AU - McClanahan, T. R.

AU - Maina, J.

AU - Starger, C. J.

AU - Herron-Perez, P.

AU - Dusek, E.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Predicting the response of coral reefs to large-scale mortality induced by climate change will depend greatly on the factors that influence recovery after bleaching events. We experimentally transplanted hard corals from a shallow reef with highly variable seawater temperature (23-36°C) to three unfished marine parks and three fished reefs with variable coral predator abundance and benthic cover. The transplanted corals were fragmented colonies collected from a reef that was relatively undisturbed by the 1997-1998 warm-water temperature anomaly, one of the most extreme thermal events of the past century, and it was assumed that they would represent corals likely to succeed in the future temperature environment. We examined the effects of four taxa, two fragment sizes, an acclimation period, benthic cover components, predators and tourists on the survival of the coral fragments. We found the lowest survival of transplants occurred in the unfished marine parks and this could be attributed to predation and not tourist damage. The density of small coral recruits approximately 6 months after the spawning season was generally moderate (~40-60/m2), and not different on fished and unfished reefs. Coral recovery between 1998 and 2002 was variable (0-25%), low (mean of 6.5%), and not different between fished and unfished reefs. There was high variability in coral mortality among the three unfished areas despite low variation in estimates of predator biomass, with the highest predation occurring in the Malindi MNP, a site with high coralline algal cover. Stepwise multiple regression analysis with 14 variables of coral predators and substratum showed that coralline algae was positively, and turf algae negatively associated with mortality of the transplants, with all other variables being statistically insignificant. This suggests that alternate food resources and predator choices are more important than predator biomass in determining coral survival. Nonetheless, large predatory fish in areas dominated by coralline algae may considerably retard recovery of eurythermal corals. This will not necessarily retard total hard coral recovery, as other more predator-tolerant taxa can recover. Based on the results, global climate change will not necessarily favor eurythermal over stenothermal coral taxa in remote or unfished reefs, where predation is a major cause of coral mortality.

AB - Predicting the response of coral reefs to large-scale mortality induced by climate change will depend greatly on the factors that influence recovery after bleaching events. We experimentally transplanted hard corals from a shallow reef with highly variable seawater temperature (23-36°C) to three unfished marine parks and three fished reefs with variable coral predator abundance and benthic cover. The transplanted corals were fragmented colonies collected from a reef that was relatively undisturbed by the 1997-1998 warm-water temperature anomaly, one of the most extreme thermal events of the past century, and it was assumed that they would represent corals likely to succeed in the future temperature environment. We examined the effects of four taxa, two fragment sizes, an acclimation period, benthic cover components, predators and tourists on the survival of the coral fragments. We found the lowest survival of transplants occurred in the unfished marine parks and this could be attributed to predation and not tourist damage. The density of small coral recruits approximately 6 months after the spawning season was generally moderate (~40-60/m2), and not different on fished and unfished reefs. Coral recovery between 1998 and 2002 was variable (0-25%), low (mean of 6.5%), and not different between fished and unfished reefs. There was high variability in coral mortality among the three unfished areas despite low variation in estimates of predator biomass, with the highest predation occurring in the Malindi MNP, a site with high coralline algal cover. Stepwise multiple regression analysis with 14 variables of coral predators and substratum showed that coralline algae was positively, and turf algae negatively associated with mortality of the transplants, with all other variables being statistically insignificant. This suggests that alternate food resources and predator choices are more important than predator biomass in determining coral survival. Nonetheless, large predatory fish in areas dominated by coralline algae may considerably retard recovery of eurythermal corals. This will not necessarily retard total hard coral recovery, as other more predator-tolerant taxa can recover. Based on the results, global climate change will not necessarily favor eurythermal over stenothermal coral taxa in remote or unfished reefs, where predation is a major cause of coral mortality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21544461775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00338-004-0471-1

DO - 10.1007/s00338-004-0471-1

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 230

EP - 246

JO - Coral Reefs

T2 - Coral Reefs

JF - Coral Reefs

SN - 0722-4028

IS - 2

ER -

McClanahan TR, Maina J, Starger CJ, Herron-Perez P, Dusek E. Detriments to post-bleaching recovery of corals. Coral Reefs. 2005 Jun;24(2):230-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-004-0471-1