(De)valuing partnerships in contemporary teacher education: lessons from four Australian universities

Lindsay Parry, Yi Ren, R. E. Bobby Harreveld, P. A. Danaher

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

To be effective, productive and sustainable, teacher education faculties need to mobilise multiple partnerships involving diverse groups of gatekeepers, participants and stakeholders with separate aspirations. A key element of that mobilization must be identifying ways to fulfill those aspirations as far as possible, thereby valuing members of the partnerships. Yet, given that partners’ interests are often competing, it is difficult to value all partners equally, potentially leading to a devaluing of the partnership and of the teacher education that it is intended to promote. This paper addresses the research question, “Which forms of partnerships add value to and are valued by Australian schools and faculties of teacher education?” The research context is four such schools and faculties, traversing regional Queensland and metropolitan Sydney. The research design draws on a qualitative, inductive, comparative case study method (Lloyd-Jones, 2003) that elicited analytical themes from a common set of questions applied to selected teacher education partnerships in the four institutions. The thematic analysis (Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006) applied to the responses to these questions yielded findings that were consistent with the theoretical framework related to educational partnerships developed by Cardini (2006). In particular, the valuing of partnerships depends on explicit and sustained efforts to value the contributions of individual partners and to render the partnership the sum of all parts, rather than being principally to benefit the host institution. The significance of these findings lies in identified strategies for teacher education schools and faculties and their diverse partners to enhance the mutual advantages of their partnerships.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationAustralian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference 2011
Subtitle of host publicationproceedings : valuing teacher education : policy, perspective and partnership
Place of PublicationAustralia
PublisherAustralian Teacher Education Association
Pages1-8
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 2011
EventAustralian Teacher Education Association Conference - Melbourne
Duration: 3 Jul 20116 Jul 2011

Conference

ConferenceAustralian Teacher Education Association Conference
CityMelbourne
Period3/07/116/07/11

Fingerprint

university
teacher
education
gatekeeper
school education
school
research planning
mobilization
Values
stakeholder
Group

Keywords

  • Australia
  • partnerships
  • teacher education
  • valuing

Cite this

Parry, L., Ren, Y., Harreveld, R. E. B., & Danaher, P. A. (2011). (De)valuing partnerships in contemporary teacher education: lessons from four Australian universities. In Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference 2011: proceedings : valuing teacher education : policy, perspective and partnership (pp. 1-8). Australia: Australian Teacher Education Association.
Parry, Lindsay ; Ren, Yi ; Harreveld, R. E. Bobby ; Danaher, P. A. / (De)valuing partnerships in contemporary teacher education : lessons from four Australian universities. Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference 2011: proceedings : valuing teacher education : policy, perspective and partnership. Australia : Australian Teacher Education Association, 2011. pp. 1-8
@inproceedings{9faee5bd8fd74517852cd113aa7328af,
title = "(De)valuing partnerships in contemporary teacher education: lessons from four Australian universities",
abstract = "To be effective, productive and sustainable, teacher education faculties need to mobilise multiple partnerships involving diverse groups of gatekeepers, participants and stakeholders with separate aspirations. A key element of that mobilization must be identifying ways to fulfill those aspirations as far as possible, thereby valuing members of the partnerships. Yet, given that partners’ interests are often competing, it is difficult to value all partners equally, potentially leading to a devaluing of the partnership and of the teacher education that it is intended to promote. This paper addresses the research question, “Which forms of partnerships add value to and are valued by Australian schools and faculties of teacher education?” The research context is four such schools and faculties, traversing regional Queensland and metropolitan Sydney. The research design draws on a qualitative, inductive, comparative case study method (Lloyd-Jones, 2003) that elicited analytical themes from a common set of questions applied to selected teacher education partnerships in the four institutions. The thematic analysis (Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006) applied to the responses to these questions yielded findings that were consistent with the theoretical framework related to educational partnerships developed by Cardini (2006). In particular, the valuing of partnerships depends on explicit and sustained efforts to value the contributions of individual partners and to render the partnership the sum of all parts, rather than being principally to benefit the host institution. The significance of these findings lies in identified strategies for teacher education schools and faculties and their diverse partners to enhance the mutual advantages of their partnerships.",
keywords = "Australia, partnerships, teacher education, valuing",
author = "Lindsay Parry and Yi Ren and Harreveld, {R. E. Bobby} and Danaher, {P. A.}",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
pages = "1--8",
booktitle = "Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference 2011",
publisher = "Australian Teacher Education Association",

}

Parry, L, Ren, Y, Harreveld, REB & Danaher, PA 2011, (De)valuing partnerships in contemporary teacher education: lessons from four Australian universities. in Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference 2011: proceedings : valuing teacher education : policy, perspective and partnership. Australian Teacher Education Association, Australia, pp. 1-8, Australian Teacher Education Association Conference, Melbourne, 3/07/11.

(De)valuing partnerships in contemporary teacher education : lessons from four Australian universities. / Parry, Lindsay; Ren, Yi; Harreveld, R. E. Bobby; Danaher, P. A.

Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference 2011: proceedings : valuing teacher education : policy, perspective and partnership. Australia : Australian Teacher Education Association, 2011. p. 1-8.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - (De)valuing partnerships in contemporary teacher education

T2 - lessons from four Australian universities

AU - Parry, Lindsay

AU - Ren, Yi

AU - Harreveld, R. E. Bobby

AU - Danaher, P. A.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - To be effective, productive and sustainable, teacher education faculties need to mobilise multiple partnerships involving diverse groups of gatekeepers, participants and stakeholders with separate aspirations. A key element of that mobilization must be identifying ways to fulfill those aspirations as far as possible, thereby valuing members of the partnerships. Yet, given that partners’ interests are often competing, it is difficult to value all partners equally, potentially leading to a devaluing of the partnership and of the teacher education that it is intended to promote. This paper addresses the research question, “Which forms of partnerships add value to and are valued by Australian schools and faculties of teacher education?” The research context is four such schools and faculties, traversing regional Queensland and metropolitan Sydney. The research design draws on a qualitative, inductive, comparative case study method (Lloyd-Jones, 2003) that elicited analytical themes from a common set of questions applied to selected teacher education partnerships in the four institutions. The thematic analysis (Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006) applied to the responses to these questions yielded findings that were consistent with the theoretical framework related to educational partnerships developed by Cardini (2006). In particular, the valuing of partnerships depends on explicit and sustained efforts to value the contributions of individual partners and to render the partnership the sum of all parts, rather than being principally to benefit the host institution. The significance of these findings lies in identified strategies for teacher education schools and faculties and their diverse partners to enhance the mutual advantages of their partnerships.

AB - To be effective, productive and sustainable, teacher education faculties need to mobilise multiple partnerships involving diverse groups of gatekeepers, participants and stakeholders with separate aspirations. A key element of that mobilization must be identifying ways to fulfill those aspirations as far as possible, thereby valuing members of the partnerships. Yet, given that partners’ interests are often competing, it is difficult to value all partners equally, potentially leading to a devaluing of the partnership and of the teacher education that it is intended to promote. This paper addresses the research question, “Which forms of partnerships add value to and are valued by Australian schools and faculties of teacher education?” The research context is four such schools and faculties, traversing regional Queensland and metropolitan Sydney. The research design draws on a qualitative, inductive, comparative case study method (Lloyd-Jones, 2003) that elicited analytical themes from a common set of questions applied to selected teacher education partnerships in the four institutions. The thematic analysis (Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006) applied to the responses to these questions yielded findings that were consistent with the theoretical framework related to educational partnerships developed by Cardini (2006). In particular, the valuing of partnerships depends on explicit and sustained efforts to value the contributions of individual partners and to render the partnership the sum of all parts, rather than being principally to benefit the host institution. The significance of these findings lies in identified strategies for teacher education schools and faculties and their diverse partners to enhance the mutual advantages of their partnerships.

KW - Australia

KW - partnerships

KW - teacher education

KW - valuing

M3 - Conference proceeding contribution

SP - 1

EP - 8

BT - Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference 2011

PB - Australian Teacher Education Association

CY - Australia

ER -

Parry L, Ren Y, Harreveld REB, Danaher PA. (De)valuing partnerships in contemporary teacher education: lessons from four Australian universities. In Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference 2011: proceedings : valuing teacher education : policy, perspective and partnership. Australia: Australian Teacher Education Association. 2011. p. 1-8