TY - JOUR
T1 - Developed and developing world responsibilities for historical climate change and CO2 mitigation
AU - Wei, Ting
AU - Yang, Shili
AU - Moore, John C.
AU - Shi, Peijun
AU - Cui, Xuefeng
AU - Duan, Qingyun
AU - Xu, Bing
AU - Dai, Yongjiu
AU - Yuan, Wenping
AU - Wei, Xin
AU - Yang, Zhipeng
AU - Wen, Tijian
AU - Teng, Fei
AU - Gao, Yun
AU - Chou, Jieming
AU - Yan, Xiaodong
AU - Wei, Zhigang
AU - Guo, Yan
AU - Jiang, Yundi
AU - Gao, Xuejie
AU - Wang, Kaicun
AU - Zheng, Xiaogu
AU - Ren, Fumin
AU - Lv, Shihua
AU - Yu, Yongqiang
AU - Liu, Bin
AU - Luo, Yong
AU - Li, Weijing
AU - Ji, Duoying
AU - Feng, Jinming
AU - Wu, Qizhong
AU - Cheng, Huaqiong
AU - He, Jiankun
AU - Fu, Congbin
AU - Ye, Duzheng
AU - Xu, Guanhua
AU - Dong, Wenjie
PY - 2012/8/7
Y1 - 2012/8/7
N2 - At the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference in Cancun, in November 2010, the Heads of State reached an agreement on the aim of limiting the global temperature rise to 2°C relative to preindustrial levels. They recognized that long-term future warming is primarily constrained by cumulative anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, that deep cuts in global emissions are required, and that action based on equity must be taken to meet this objective. However, negotiations on emission reduction among countries are increasingly fraught with difficulty, partly because of arguments about the responsibility for the ongoing temperature rise. Simulations with two earth-system models (NCAR/CESM and BNU-ESM) demonstrate that developed countries had contributed about 60-80%, developing countries about 20-40%, to the global temperature rise, upper ocean warming, and sea-ice reduction by 2005. Enacting pledges made at Cancun with continuation to 2100 leads to a reduction in global temperature rise relative to business as usual with a 1/3-2/3 (CESM 33-67%, BNU-ESM 35-65%) contribution from developed and developing countries, respectively. To prevent a temperature rise by 2°C or more in 2100, it is necessary to fill the gap with more ambitious mitigation efforts.
AB - At the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference in Cancun, in November 2010, the Heads of State reached an agreement on the aim of limiting the global temperature rise to 2°C relative to preindustrial levels. They recognized that long-term future warming is primarily constrained by cumulative anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, that deep cuts in global emissions are required, and that action based on equity must be taken to meet this objective. However, negotiations on emission reduction among countries are increasingly fraught with difficulty, partly because of arguments about the responsibility for the ongoing temperature rise. Simulations with two earth-system models (NCAR/CESM and BNU-ESM) demonstrate that developed countries had contributed about 60-80%, developing countries about 20-40%, to the global temperature rise, upper ocean warming, and sea-ice reduction by 2005. Enacting pledges made at Cancun with continuation to 2100 leads to a reduction in global temperature rise relative to business as usual with a 1/3-2/3 (CESM 33-67%, BNU-ESM 35-65%) contribution from developed and developing countries, respectively. To prevent a temperature rise by 2°C or more in 2100, it is necessary to fill the gap with more ambitious mitigation efforts.
KW - Cancun pledge
KW - Climate ethics
KW - Climate modeling
KW - Coupled model intercomparison project phase 5
KW - Geoengineering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864682078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1203282109
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1203282109
M3 - Article
C2 - 22826257
AN - SCOPUS:84864682078
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 109
SP - 12911
EP - 12915
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 32
ER -