Developing a Framework for Analyzing Definitions: A study of The Feynman Lectures

Chee Leong Wong, Hye Eun Chu, Kueh Chin Yap

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

One important purpose of a definition is to explain the meaning of a word. Any problems associated with a definition may impede students' learning. However, research studies on the definitional problems from the perspective of physics education are limited. Physics educators may not be aware of the nature and extent of definitional problems. As an example, The Feynman Lectures of Physics suggest that there are at least four problems of definition: precision, circularity, context and completeness in knowledge. Feynman had the tendency of mentioning the words 'define' and 'definition' and discussing the problems of definition: they can be insightful, or challenge the conventional, preconceived notions of many physical concepts. One benefit of this study is that a framework can be developed to improve statements of definitions. This framework may guide educators or students to analyze the knowledge that is embedded in a definition. In the future, the learning of definition need not be content-oriented, but problem-based instead, with the help of definitional problems. Therefore, the use of these problems of definition in lessons can be an interesting area for future physics education research. Furthermore, we should be cognizant of inadequacies or inaccuracies in definition that may result in alternative conceptions.

LanguageEnglish
Pages2481-2513
Number of pages33
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume36
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

physics
educator
learning
education
student

Cite this

@article{b7e42f2f0a364d4aa98a1c33cbd000f9,
title = "Developing a Framework for Analyzing Definitions: A study of The Feynman Lectures",
abstract = "One important purpose of a definition is to explain the meaning of a word. Any problems associated with a definition may impede students' learning. However, research studies on the definitional problems from the perspective of physics education are limited. Physics educators may not be aware of the nature and extent of definitional problems. As an example, The Feynman Lectures of Physics suggest that there are at least four problems of definition: precision, circularity, context and completeness in knowledge. Feynman had the tendency of mentioning the words 'define' and 'definition' and discussing the problems of definition: they can be insightful, or challenge the conventional, preconceived notions of many physical concepts. One benefit of this study is that a framework can be developed to improve statements of definitions. This framework may guide educators or students to analyze the knowledge that is embedded in a definition. In the future, the learning of definition need not be content-oriented, but problem-based instead, with the help of definitional problems. Therefore, the use of these problems of definition in lessons can be an interesting area for future physics education research. Furthermore, we should be cognizant of inadequacies or inaccuracies in definition that may result in alternative conceptions.",
author = "Wong, {Chee Leong} and Chu, {Hye Eun} and Yap, {Kueh Chin}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2014.893594",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "2481--2513",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "15",

}

Developing a Framework for Analyzing Definitions : A study of The Feynman Lectures. / Wong, Chee Leong; Chu, Hye Eun; Yap, Kueh Chin.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 36, No. 15, 2014, p. 2481-2513.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing a Framework for Analyzing Definitions

T2 - International Journal of Science Education

AU - Wong, Chee Leong

AU - Chu, Hye Eun

AU - Yap, Kueh Chin

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - One important purpose of a definition is to explain the meaning of a word. Any problems associated with a definition may impede students' learning. However, research studies on the definitional problems from the perspective of physics education are limited. Physics educators may not be aware of the nature and extent of definitional problems. As an example, The Feynman Lectures of Physics suggest that there are at least four problems of definition: precision, circularity, context and completeness in knowledge. Feynman had the tendency of mentioning the words 'define' and 'definition' and discussing the problems of definition: they can be insightful, or challenge the conventional, preconceived notions of many physical concepts. One benefit of this study is that a framework can be developed to improve statements of definitions. This framework may guide educators or students to analyze the knowledge that is embedded in a definition. In the future, the learning of definition need not be content-oriented, but problem-based instead, with the help of definitional problems. Therefore, the use of these problems of definition in lessons can be an interesting area for future physics education research. Furthermore, we should be cognizant of inadequacies or inaccuracies in definition that may result in alternative conceptions.

AB - One important purpose of a definition is to explain the meaning of a word. Any problems associated with a definition may impede students' learning. However, research studies on the definitional problems from the perspective of physics education are limited. Physics educators may not be aware of the nature and extent of definitional problems. As an example, The Feynman Lectures of Physics suggest that there are at least four problems of definition: precision, circularity, context and completeness in knowledge. Feynman had the tendency of mentioning the words 'define' and 'definition' and discussing the problems of definition: they can be insightful, or challenge the conventional, preconceived notions of many physical concepts. One benefit of this study is that a framework can be developed to improve statements of definitions. This framework may guide educators or students to analyze the knowledge that is embedded in a definition. In the future, the learning of definition need not be content-oriented, but problem-based instead, with the help of definitional problems. Therefore, the use of these problems of definition in lessons can be an interesting area for future physics education research. Furthermore, we should be cognizant of inadequacies or inaccuracies in definition that may result in alternative conceptions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905825897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2014.893594

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2014.893594

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 2481

EP - 2513

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 15

ER -