Developing an evaluation rubric for planning and assessing SSI‑Based STEAM programs in science classrooms

Ha My Anna Mang, Hye-Eun Chu*, Sonya N. Martin, Chan-Jong Kim

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This multi-phase study designed a program evaluation rubric which used a qualitative rating system to help teachers identify key learning goals, dimensions, and principles related to the socio-scientifc issues (SSI)-based science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics (STEAM) approach for science education. This rubric contains 37 criteria that address one or more key principles of the SSI-based STEAM approach embedded in a 6E inquiry-based instructional model. It is organised into seven evaluation categories: (1)
learning outcomes, (2) engage, (3) explain, (4) explore, (5) elaborate, (6) evaluate, and (7) enact. The newly developed rubric was used to evaluate six different climate change programs to determine whether it could measure the intended dimensions and principles and to assess its applicability across varying contexts. This research has implications for providing a tool for teachers to plan and design SSI-based STEAM programs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1119-1144
Number of pages26
JournalResearch in Science Education
Volume53
Issue number6
Early online date25 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2023. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • teaching
  • evaluation and program development rubric
  • rubric
  • STEAM
  • SSI-based STEAM
  • SSI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing an evaluation rubric for planning and assessing SSI‑Based STEAM programs in science classrooms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this