TY - JOUR
T1 - Diabetic Retinopathy Screening at the Point of Care (DR SPOC)
T2 - detecting undiagnosed and vision-threatening retinopathy by integrating portable technologies within existing services
AU - Weerasinghe, Lakni Shahanika
AU - Dunn, Hamish Paul
AU - Fung, Adrian T.
AU - Maberly, Glen
AU - Cheung, Ngai Wah
AU - Weerasinghe, Daminda P.
AU - Liew, Gerald
AU - Do, Helen
AU - Hng, Tien Ming
AU - Pryke, Alison
AU - Marks, Samuel I.
AU - Nguyen, Helen
AU - Jayaballa, Rajini
AU - Gurung, Seema
AU - Ford, Belinda
AU - Bishay, Ramy H.
AU - Girgis, Christian M.
AU - Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon
AU - Keay, Lisa
AU - White, Andrew J.
N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2023. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.
PY - 2023/8/2
Y1 - 2023/8/2
N2 - Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a low socioeconomic region of a high-income country, as well as determine the diagnostic utility of point-of-care screening for high-risk populations in tertiary care settings. Research design and methods This was a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes attending foot ulcer or integrated care diabetes clinics at two Western Sydney hospitals (n=273). DR was assessed using portable, two-field, non-mydriatic fundus photography and combined electroretinogram/ pupillometry (ERG). With mydriatic photographs used as the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of the devices were determined. Prevalence of DR and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) were reported, with multivariate logistic regression used to identify predictors of DR. Results Among 273 patients, 39.6% had any DR, while 15.8% had VTDR, of whom 59.3% and 62.8% were previously undiagnosed, respectively. Non-mydriatic photography demonstrated 20.2% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity for any DR, with a 56.7% screening failure rate. Meanwhile, mydriatic photography produced high-quality images with a 7.6% failure rate. ERG demonstrated 72.5% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity, with a 15.0% failure rate. The RETeval ERG was noted to have an optimal DR cut-off score at 22. Multivariate logistic regression identified an eGFR of ≤29 mL/min/1.73 m 2, HbA1c of ≥7.0%, pupil size of <4 mm diameter, diabetes duration of 5-24 years and RETeval score of ≥22 as strong predictors of DR. Conclusion There is a high prevalence of vision-threatening and undiagnosed DR among patients attending high-risk tertiary clinics in Western Sydney. Point-of-care DR screening using portable, mydriatic photography demonstrates potential as a model of care which is easily accessible, targeted for high-risk populations and substantially enhances DR detection.
AB - Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a low socioeconomic region of a high-income country, as well as determine the diagnostic utility of point-of-care screening for high-risk populations in tertiary care settings. Research design and methods This was a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes attending foot ulcer or integrated care diabetes clinics at two Western Sydney hospitals (n=273). DR was assessed using portable, two-field, non-mydriatic fundus photography and combined electroretinogram/ pupillometry (ERG). With mydriatic photographs used as the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of the devices were determined. Prevalence of DR and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) were reported, with multivariate logistic regression used to identify predictors of DR. Results Among 273 patients, 39.6% had any DR, while 15.8% had VTDR, of whom 59.3% and 62.8% were previously undiagnosed, respectively. Non-mydriatic photography demonstrated 20.2% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity for any DR, with a 56.7% screening failure rate. Meanwhile, mydriatic photography produced high-quality images with a 7.6% failure rate. ERG demonstrated 72.5% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity, with a 15.0% failure rate. The RETeval ERG was noted to have an optimal DR cut-off score at 22. Multivariate logistic regression identified an eGFR of ≤29 mL/min/1.73 m 2, HbA1c of ≥7.0%, pupil size of <4 mm diameter, diabetes duration of 5-24 years and RETeval score of ≥22 as strong predictors of DR. Conclusion There is a high prevalence of vision-threatening and undiagnosed DR among patients attending high-risk tertiary clinics in Western Sydney. Point-of-care DR screening using portable, mydriatic photography demonstrates potential as a model of care which is easily accessible, targeted for high-risk populations and substantially enhances DR detection.
KW - Diabetic Retinopathy
KW - Early Diagnosis
KW - Eye
KW - Point-of-Care Systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166397825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003376
DO - 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003376
M3 - Article
C2 - 37532459
AN - SCOPUS:85166397825
SN - 2052-4897
VL - 11
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
JF - BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
IS - 4
M1 - e003376
ER -