Diagnoses and treatment recommendations on workers compensation medical certificates

E. Schonstein*, D. T. Kenny

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To review the diagnostic descriptions and treatment recommendations for back and neck pain on the new workers compensation medical certificates and compare these with evidence-based guidelines. Design: Retrospective analysis of 251 medical certificates of workers with compensable neck and back pain held by a workers compensation insurer. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses given and treatments prescribed by the nominated treating doctors. Results: The diagnoses most frequently used were 'sprain/strain' and 'pain/ache'. Physiotherapy was the most frequently prescribed treatment, followed by rest and medication. Rest was prescribed for 68 (27%) workers, 87% of whom were classified as having an acute injury. Activity-based treatments were prescribed for 45 (18%) workers. Conclusions: Not all doctors used diagnostic terms consistent with recommended anatomical taxonomy. The drug therapy prescribed was consistent with current evidence-based treatment guidelines. However, the prescribing of rest, and the omission, in most cases, of explicit recommendations to resume normal activities, including work, are not consistent with current guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-422
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume173
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 16 Oct 2000

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnoses and treatment recommendations on workers compensation medical certificates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this