Differences in naturalistic deception between autistic and neurotypical individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Avni Bharadwaj*, Naomi Sweller, Nicole Dargue, Michael P. Jones

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Autistic individuals may be perceived as less honest than neurotypical counterparts, particularly when their neurotype is unknown. However, findings on naturalistic deception in autism remain mixed. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined naturalistic deception differences between autistic and neurotypical individuals. Sixteen studies (430 autistic and 430 neurotypical participants) were identified through searches of five databases (1994 to July 2024). A meta-analysis on 10 studies revealed that across studies, autistic participants deceived significantly less than neurotypical participants in hide-and-seek tasks, but showed no significant difference in temptation resistance tasks. Due to heterogeneity across studies, potential moderators such as age, gender, and experimenter neurotype could not be investigated. Findings have implications for improving understanding of autistic individuals’ communication preferences.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalReview Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Sept 2025

Keywords

  • autism
  • communication
  • deception
  • executive functioning
  • social cognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in naturalistic deception between autistic and neurotypical individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this