Differential processing: towards a unified model of direction and speed perception

Max Farrell-Whelan, Kevin R. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In two experiments, we demonstrate a misperception of the velocity of a random-dot stimulus moving in the presence of a static line oriented obliquely to the direction of dot motion. As shown in previous studies, the perceived direction of the dots is shifted away from the orientation of the static line, with the size of the shift varying as a function of line orientation relative to dot direction (the statically-induced direction illusion, or 'SDI'). In addition, we report a novel effect - that perceived speed also varies as a function of relative line orientation, decreasing systematically as the angle is reduced from 90° to 0°. We propose that these illusions both stem from the differential processing of object-relative and non-object-relative component velocities, with the latter being perceptually underestimated with respect to the former by a constant ratio. Although previous proposals regarding the SDI have not allowed quantitative accounts, we present a unified formal model of perceived velocity (both direction and speed) with the magnitude of this ratio as the only free parameter. The model was successful in accounting for the angular repulsion of motion direction across line orientations, and in predicting the systematic decrease in perceived velocity as the line's angle was reduced. Although fitting for direction and speed produced different best-fit values of the ratio of underestimation of non-object-relative motion compared to object-relative motion (with the ratio for speed being larger than that for direction) this discrepancy may be due to differences in the psychophysical procedures for measuring direction and speed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages10-18
Number of pages9
JournalVision Research
Volume92
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Direction compound

Bibliographical note

Erratum can be found at Vision Research volume 96, p150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.022

Keywords

  • differential processing
  • statically-induced direction illusion
  • relative motion

Cite this

@article{8338734690f842f7a8facd75f4e323ca,
title = "Differential processing: towards a unified model of direction and speed perception",
abstract = "In two experiments, we demonstrate a misperception of the velocity of a random-dot stimulus moving in the presence of a static line oriented obliquely to the direction of dot motion. As shown in previous studies, the perceived direction of the dots is shifted away from the orientation of the static line, with the size of the shift varying as a function of line orientation relative to dot direction (the statically-induced direction illusion, or 'SDI'). In addition, we report a novel effect - that perceived speed also varies as a function of relative line orientation, decreasing systematically as the angle is reduced from 90° to 0°. We propose that these illusions both stem from the differential processing of object-relative and non-object-relative component velocities, with the latter being perceptually underestimated with respect to the former by a constant ratio. Although previous proposals regarding the SDI have not allowed quantitative accounts, we present a unified formal model of perceived velocity (both direction and speed) with the magnitude of this ratio as the only free parameter. The model was successful in accounting for the angular repulsion of motion direction across line orientations, and in predicting the systematic decrease in perceived velocity as the line's angle was reduced. Although fitting for direction and speed produced different best-fit values of the ratio of underestimation of non-object-relative motion compared to object-relative motion (with the ratio for speed being larger than that for direction) this discrepancy may be due to differences in the psychophysical procedures for measuring direction and speed.",
keywords = "differential processing, statically-induced direction illusion, relative motion",
author = "Max Farrell-Whelan and Brooks, {Kevin R.}",
note = "Erratum can be found at Vision Research volume 96, p150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.022",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2013.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "10--18",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Differential processing : towards a unified model of direction and speed perception. / Farrell-Whelan, Max; Brooks, Kevin R.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 92, 2013, p. 10-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential processing

T2 - Vision Research

AU - Farrell-Whelan, Max

AU - Brooks, Kevin R.

N1 - Erratum can be found at Vision Research volume 96, p150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.022

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In two experiments, we demonstrate a misperception of the velocity of a random-dot stimulus moving in the presence of a static line oriented obliquely to the direction of dot motion. As shown in previous studies, the perceived direction of the dots is shifted away from the orientation of the static line, with the size of the shift varying as a function of line orientation relative to dot direction (the statically-induced direction illusion, or 'SDI'). In addition, we report a novel effect - that perceived speed also varies as a function of relative line orientation, decreasing systematically as the angle is reduced from 90° to 0°. We propose that these illusions both stem from the differential processing of object-relative and non-object-relative component velocities, with the latter being perceptually underestimated with respect to the former by a constant ratio. Although previous proposals regarding the SDI have not allowed quantitative accounts, we present a unified formal model of perceived velocity (both direction and speed) with the magnitude of this ratio as the only free parameter. The model was successful in accounting for the angular repulsion of motion direction across line orientations, and in predicting the systematic decrease in perceived velocity as the line's angle was reduced. Although fitting for direction and speed produced different best-fit values of the ratio of underestimation of non-object-relative motion compared to object-relative motion (with the ratio for speed being larger than that for direction) this discrepancy may be due to differences in the psychophysical procedures for measuring direction and speed.

AB - In two experiments, we demonstrate a misperception of the velocity of a random-dot stimulus moving in the presence of a static line oriented obliquely to the direction of dot motion. As shown in previous studies, the perceived direction of the dots is shifted away from the orientation of the static line, with the size of the shift varying as a function of line orientation relative to dot direction (the statically-induced direction illusion, or 'SDI'). In addition, we report a novel effect - that perceived speed also varies as a function of relative line orientation, decreasing systematically as the angle is reduced from 90° to 0°. We propose that these illusions both stem from the differential processing of object-relative and non-object-relative component velocities, with the latter being perceptually underestimated with respect to the former by a constant ratio. Although previous proposals regarding the SDI have not allowed quantitative accounts, we present a unified formal model of perceived velocity (both direction and speed) with the magnitude of this ratio as the only free parameter. The model was successful in accounting for the angular repulsion of motion direction across line orientations, and in predicting the systematic decrease in perceived velocity as the line's angle was reduced. Although fitting for direction and speed produced different best-fit values of the ratio of underestimation of non-object-relative motion compared to object-relative motion (with the ratio for speed being larger than that for direction) this discrepancy may be due to differences in the psychophysical procedures for measuring direction and speed.

KW - differential processing

KW - statically-induced direction illusion

KW - relative motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884329762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896729422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.022

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2013.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2013.08.010

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 10

EP - 18

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

ER -