Direct cost comparison of totally endoscopic versus open ear surgery

Nirmal Patel*, A. Mohammadi, N. Jufas

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: Totally endoscopic ear surgery is a relatively new method for managing chronic ear disease. This study aimed to test the null hypothesis that open and endoscopic approaches have similar direct costs for the management of attic cholesteatoma, from an Australian private hospital setting. Methods: A retrospective direct cost comparison of totally endoscopic ear surgery and traditional canal wall up mastoidectomy for the management of attic cholesteatoma in a private tertiary setting was undertaken. Indirect and future costs were excluded. A direct cost comparison of anaesthetic setup and resources, operative setup and resources, and surgical time was performed between the two techniques. Results: Totally endoscopic ear surgery has a mean direct cost reduction of AUD$2978.89 per operation from the hospital perspective, when compared to canal wall up mastoidectomy. Conclusion: Totally endoscopic ear surgery is more cost-effective, from an Australian private hospital perspective, than canal wall up mastoidectomy for attic cholesteatoma.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)122-128
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
    Volume132
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

    Keywords

    • Cholesteatoma
    • Costs And Cost Analysis
    • Endoscopic Surgical Procedures
    • Otologic Surgical Procedures

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Direct cost comparison of totally endoscopic versus open ear surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this