(Dis)engaging with sustainability: Evidence from an Australian business faculty

Maria Cadiz Dyball, Andy F. Wang, Sue Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore how the lack of staff engagement with a university's strategy on sustainability could be an enabling lever for organisational change. It examines the attitudes and views of employees of a business faculty at an Australian metropolitan university as it attempts to adopt a holistic approach to sustainability.

Design/methodology/approach: The paper opted for a case study using data from an on-line survey, semi-directed interviews with key management personnel and archival material. Responses were analysed using Piderit's (2000) notion of ambivalence.

Findings: The paper provides empirical insights into why staff lacked engagement with the university's strategy on sustainability. It suggests that staff were ambivalent, displaying dissonance in their personal beliefs on sustainability, the university's strategy and the extent of their intentions to support the university. Staff were willing to offer ideas on how the university could, in the future, change towards sustainability. These ideas allow the possibility for the university to learn to adjust the scope of the implementation of its sustainability strategy.

Research limitations/implications: The research results may lack generalisability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to further examine staff attitudes on sustainability in higher education using Piderit's notion of ambivalence. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions could allow a better understanding of harmony and dissonance in cognition of and intention for university sustainability strategies and initiatives by academic, professional and sessional staff.

Practical implications: The paper includes implications for staff engagement with sustainability in higher education.

Originality/value: This paper fulfils an identified need to study how staff engagement with sustainability in higher education can be enabled for organisational learning.

LanguageEnglish
Pages69-101
Number of pages33
JournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Sustainability
Staff
Ambivalence
Dissonance
Holistic approach
Focus group discussion
In-depth interviews
Personnel management
Employees
Organizational change
Cognition
Harmony
Design methodology
Organizational learning

Cite this

Dyball, Maria Cadiz ; Wang, Andy F. ; Wright, Sue. / (Dis)engaging with sustainability : Evidence from an Australian business faculty. In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 69-101.
@article{f9ebd646f0ad48c0b9f4d21343d7bdb0,
title = "(Dis)engaging with sustainability: Evidence from an Australian business faculty",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore how the lack of staff engagement with a university's strategy on sustainability could be an enabling lever for organisational change. It examines the attitudes and views of employees of a business faculty at an Australian metropolitan university as it attempts to adopt a holistic approach to sustainability.Design/methodology/approach: The paper opted for a case study using data from an on-line survey, semi-directed interviews with key management personnel and archival material. Responses were analysed using Piderit's (2000) notion of ambivalence.Findings: The paper provides empirical insights into why staff lacked engagement with the university's strategy on sustainability. It suggests that staff were ambivalent, displaying dissonance in their personal beliefs on sustainability, the university's strategy and the extent of their intentions to support the university. Staff were willing to offer ideas on how the university could, in the future, change towards sustainability. These ideas allow the possibility for the university to learn to adjust the scope of the implementation of its sustainability strategy.Research limitations/implications: The research results may lack generalisability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to further examine staff attitudes on sustainability in higher education using Piderit's notion of ambivalence. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions could allow a better understanding of harmony and dissonance in cognition of and intention for university sustainability strategies and initiatives by academic, professional and sessional staff.Practical implications: The paper includes implications for staff engagement with sustainability in higher education.Originality/value: This paper fulfils an identified need to study how staff engagement with sustainability in higher education can be enabled for organisational learning.",
author = "Dyball, {Maria Cadiz} and Wang, {Andy F.} and Sue Wright",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1108/AAAJ-05-2014-1692",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "69--101",
journal = "Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal",
issn = "0951-3574",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "1",

}

(Dis)engaging with sustainability : Evidence from an Australian business faculty. / Dyball, Maria Cadiz; Wang, Andy F.; Wright, Sue.

In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, 19.01.2015, p. 69-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Dis)engaging with sustainability

T2 - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

AU - Dyball, Maria Cadiz

AU - Wang, Andy F.

AU - Wright, Sue

PY - 2015/1/19

Y1 - 2015/1/19

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore how the lack of staff engagement with a university's strategy on sustainability could be an enabling lever for organisational change. It examines the attitudes and views of employees of a business faculty at an Australian metropolitan university as it attempts to adopt a holistic approach to sustainability.Design/methodology/approach: The paper opted for a case study using data from an on-line survey, semi-directed interviews with key management personnel and archival material. Responses were analysed using Piderit's (2000) notion of ambivalence.Findings: The paper provides empirical insights into why staff lacked engagement with the university's strategy on sustainability. It suggests that staff were ambivalent, displaying dissonance in their personal beliefs on sustainability, the university's strategy and the extent of their intentions to support the university. Staff were willing to offer ideas on how the university could, in the future, change towards sustainability. These ideas allow the possibility for the university to learn to adjust the scope of the implementation of its sustainability strategy.Research limitations/implications: The research results may lack generalisability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to further examine staff attitudes on sustainability in higher education using Piderit's notion of ambivalence. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions could allow a better understanding of harmony and dissonance in cognition of and intention for university sustainability strategies and initiatives by academic, professional and sessional staff.Practical implications: The paper includes implications for staff engagement with sustainability in higher education.Originality/value: This paper fulfils an identified need to study how staff engagement with sustainability in higher education can be enabled for organisational learning.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore how the lack of staff engagement with a university's strategy on sustainability could be an enabling lever for organisational change. It examines the attitudes and views of employees of a business faculty at an Australian metropolitan university as it attempts to adopt a holistic approach to sustainability.Design/methodology/approach: The paper opted for a case study using data from an on-line survey, semi-directed interviews with key management personnel and archival material. Responses were analysed using Piderit's (2000) notion of ambivalence.Findings: The paper provides empirical insights into why staff lacked engagement with the university's strategy on sustainability. It suggests that staff were ambivalent, displaying dissonance in their personal beliefs on sustainability, the university's strategy and the extent of their intentions to support the university. Staff were willing to offer ideas on how the university could, in the future, change towards sustainability. These ideas allow the possibility for the university to learn to adjust the scope of the implementation of its sustainability strategy.Research limitations/implications: The research results may lack generalisability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to further examine staff attitudes on sustainability in higher education using Piderit's notion of ambivalence. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions could allow a better understanding of harmony and dissonance in cognition of and intention for university sustainability strategies and initiatives by academic, professional and sessional staff.Practical implications: The paper includes implications for staff engagement with sustainability in higher education.Originality/value: This paper fulfils an identified need to study how staff engagement with sustainability in higher education can be enabled for organisational learning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921869633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2014-1692

DO - 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2014-1692

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 69

EP - 101

JO - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

JF - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

SN - 0951-3574

IS - 1

ER -