Dismantling the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention: Verbal contingencies for stuttering and clinical measurement

Elisabeth Harrison, Mark Onslow, Ross Menzies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Data have accumulated to show that the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention is a safe treatment with positive outcomes for preschoolers who stutter, and a randomized controlled trial is under way at the time of writing. Program components have not been investigated experimentally so the functionality of each component is unknown. Aims: The aim of this preliminary study was to establish the viability of a programme of research that would assess the clinical value of two program components. These components were parental verbal contingencies for stuttering and severity ratings. Methods & Procedures: In the present preliminary experiment, 38 preschool children were randomized to an experiment involving a 4-week 'dose' of treatment followed by 4 weeks without treatment. The dependent variable was the percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) obtained from the mean %SS score from recordings on three recording occasions. Outcomes & Results: Some preliminary indications were found that parental verbal contingencies for stuttering contributed to treatment outcomes. No preliminary evidence was found for the contribution of parent severity ratings to treatment outcomes. Conclusions: It was concluded that a robust, statistical demonstration of these result would be desirable, but effect size estimates from the present data show that access to more than 650 families of stuttering preschool children would be required for such a study. Such a project would be beyond the resources of any one research group to complete in a timely manner, and a method to address this problem is proposed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages257-267
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

Stuttering
dismantling
contingency
Preschool Children
preschool child
recording
Demonstrations
Experiments
rating
experiment
Research
functionality
indication
parents
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Lidcombe Program
Contingency
present
resources

Cite this

@article{c815253ac179477094dcdc93b7fa1548,
title = "Dismantling the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention: Verbal contingencies for stuttering and clinical measurement",
abstract = "Background: Data have accumulated to show that the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention is a safe treatment with positive outcomes for preschoolers who stutter, and a randomized controlled trial is under way at the time of writing. Program components have not been investigated experimentally so the functionality of each component is unknown. Aims: The aim of this preliminary study was to establish the viability of a programme of research that would assess the clinical value of two program components. These components were parental verbal contingencies for stuttering and severity ratings. Methods & Procedures: In the present preliminary experiment, 38 preschool children were randomized to an experiment involving a 4-week 'dose' of treatment followed by 4 weeks without treatment. The dependent variable was the percentage of syllables stuttered ({\%}SS) obtained from the mean {\%}SS score from recordings on three recording occasions. Outcomes & Results: Some preliminary indications were found that parental verbal contingencies for stuttering contributed to treatment outcomes. No preliminary evidence was found for the contribution of parent severity ratings to treatment outcomes. Conclusions: It was concluded that a robust, statistical demonstration of these result would be desirable, but effect size estimates from the present data show that access to more than 650 families of stuttering preschool children would be required for such a study. Such a project would be beyond the resources of any one research group to complete in a timely manner, and a method to address this problem is proposed.",
author = "Elisabeth Harrison and Mark Onslow and Ross Menzies",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/13682820310001644551",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "257--267",
journal = "International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders",
issn = "1368-2822",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

Dismantling the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention : Verbal contingencies for stuttering and clinical measurement. / Harrison, Elisabeth; Onslow, Mark; Menzies, Ross.

In: International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, Vol. 39, No. 2, 04.2004, p. 257-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dismantling the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention

T2 - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

AU - Harrison, Elisabeth

AU - Onslow, Mark

AU - Menzies, Ross

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - Background: Data have accumulated to show that the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention is a safe treatment with positive outcomes for preschoolers who stutter, and a randomized controlled trial is under way at the time of writing. Program components have not been investigated experimentally so the functionality of each component is unknown. Aims: The aim of this preliminary study was to establish the viability of a programme of research that would assess the clinical value of two program components. These components were parental verbal contingencies for stuttering and severity ratings. Methods & Procedures: In the present preliminary experiment, 38 preschool children were randomized to an experiment involving a 4-week 'dose' of treatment followed by 4 weeks without treatment. The dependent variable was the percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) obtained from the mean %SS score from recordings on three recording occasions. Outcomes & Results: Some preliminary indications were found that parental verbal contingencies for stuttering contributed to treatment outcomes. No preliminary evidence was found for the contribution of parent severity ratings to treatment outcomes. Conclusions: It was concluded that a robust, statistical demonstration of these result would be desirable, but effect size estimates from the present data show that access to more than 650 families of stuttering preschool children would be required for such a study. Such a project would be beyond the resources of any one research group to complete in a timely manner, and a method to address this problem is proposed.

AB - Background: Data have accumulated to show that the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention is a safe treatment with positive outcomes for preschoolers who stutter, and a randomized controlled trial is under way at the time of writing. Program components have not been investigated experimentally so the functionality of each component is unknown. Aims: The aim of this preliminary study was to establish the viability of a programme of research that would assess the clinical value of two program components. These components were parental verbal contingencies for stuttering and severity ratings. Methods & Procedures: In the present preliminary experiment, 38 preschool children were randomized to an experiment involving a 4-week 'dose' of treatment followed by 4 weeks without treatment. The dependent variable was the percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) obtained from the mean %SS score from recordings on three recording occasions. Outcomes & Results: Some preliminary indications were found that parental verbal contingencies for stuttering contributed to treatment outcomes. No preliminary evidence was found for the contribution of parent severity ratings to treatment outcomes. Conclusions: It was concluded that a robust, statistical demonstration of these result would be desirable, but effect size estimates from the present data show that access to more than 650 families of stuttering preschool children would be required for such a study. Such a project would be beyond the resources of any one research group to complete in a timely manner, and a method to address this problem is proposed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942504924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13682820310001644551

DO - 10.1080/13682820310001644551

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 257

EP - 267

JO - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

JF - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

SN - 1368-2822

IS - 2

ER -