Dismissing subliminal perception because of its famous problems is classic "baby with the bathwater"

Matthew Finkbeiner; Max Coltheart

doi:10.1017/S0140525X13000708

Dismissing subliminal perception because of its famous problems is classic "baby with the bathwater"

Matthew Finkbeiner, Max Coltheart

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article

4 Citations (Scopus)

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Newell & Shanks (N&S) appeal to well-known problems in establishing subliminality to argue that there is little convincing evidence that subliminally presented stimuli can affect decision making. We discuss how recent studies have successfully addressed these well-known problems and, in turn, have revealed clear evidence that subliminally presented stimuli can affect decision making.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	27
Number of pages	1
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	37
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000708
Publication status	Published - 2014

Fingerprint

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2014 Cambridge University Press. Article originally published in Behavioral and brain sciences, vol 37, iss 1, p.27 (1 page). The original article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000708.

Cite this

Finkbeiner, M., & Coltheart, M. (2014). Dismissing subliminal perception because of its famous problems is classic "baby with the bathwater". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000708

@article{93ec6379c8c342de9921ff0dca56b7a4,

title = "Dismissing subliminal perception because of its famous problems is classic {"}baby with the bathwater{"}",

abstract = "Newell & Shanks (N&S) appeal to well-known problems in establishing subliminality to argue that there is little convincing evidence that subliminally presented stimuli can affect decision making. We discuss how recent studies have successfully addressed these well-known problems and, in turn, have revealed clear evidence that subliminally presented stimuli can affect decision making.",

author = "Matthew Finkbeiner and Max Coltheart",

note = "Copyright 2014 Cambridge University Press. Article originally published in Behavioral and brain sciences, vol 37, iss 1, p.27 (1 page). The original article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000708.",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X13000708",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "27",

journal = "The Behavioral and brain sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dismissing subliminal perception because of its famous problems is classic "baby with the bathwater"

AU - Finkbeiner, Matthew

AU - Coltheart, Max

N1 - Copyright 2014 Cambridge University Press. Article originally published in Behavioral and brain sciences, vol 37, iss 1, p.27 (1 page). The original article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000708.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Newell & Shanks (N&S) appeal to well-known problems in establishing subliminality to argue that there is little convincing evidence that subliminally presented stimuli can affect decision making. We discuss how recent studies have successfully addressed these well-known problems and, in turn, have revealed clear evidence that subliminally presented stimuli can affect decision making.

AB - Newell & Shanks (N&S) appeal to well-known problems in establishing subliminality to argue that there is little convincing evidence that subliminally presented stimuli can affect decision making. We discuss how recent studies have successfully addressed these well-known problems and, in turn, have revealed clear evidence that subliminally presented stimuli can affect decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896361936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X13000708

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X13000708

M3 - Review article

VL - 37

SP - 27

JO - The Behavioral and brain sciences

JF - The Behavioral and brain sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 1

ER -

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X13000708

Publisher version (open access).pdfFinal published version, 73 KB

Link to publication in Scopus