Distorted communications: feminism's dispute with Habermas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The paper reviews the extent to which main formulations in Habermas's recent major work, Between Facts and Norms, make ground against feminist objections to the Habermasian project. Although the later work does not tamper with the core project of Habermas's theory of modernity, the terms in which the procedural norms of democratic interaction are now conceived clarify the sympathetic relevance of Habermas's project to feminism's own vital concerns. There is reason to suppose Habermas's construction of the motivations that prompt and guide struggles to achieve personal autonomy is rather too narrowly conceived to capture the range of impulses that inform contemporary feminism. Despite this, I suggest that there remain good reasons for supposing that the recent conception of the project opens up the possibility for a more positive stage in Habermas's dialogue with feminism.

LanguageEnglish
Pages39-62
Number of pages24
JournalPhilosophy & Social Criticism
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

feminism
communications
modernity
autonomy
dialogue
Communication
Feminism
Dispute
interaction

Keywords

  • aesthetic communication
  • feminism
  • Habermas
  • private/public relations
  • public sphere

Cite this

@article{8172abdc0404470d9fe9dd8f56dd7c8f,
title = "Distorted communications: feminism's dispute with Habermas",
abstract = "The paper reviews the extent to which main formulations in Habermas's recent major work, Between Facts and Norms, make ground against feminist objections to the Habermasian project. Although the later work does not tamper with the core project of Habermas's theory of modernity, the terms in which the procedural norms of democratic interaction are now conceived clarify the sympathetic relevance of Habermas's project to feminism's own vital concerns. There is reason to suppose Habermas's construction of the motivations that prompt and guide struggles to achieve personal autonomy is rather too narrowly conceived to capture the range of impulses that inform contemporary feminism. Despite this, I suggest that there remain good reasons for supposing that the recent conception of the project opens up the possibility for a more positive stage in Habermas's dialogue with feminism.",
keywords = "aesthetic communication, feminism, Habermas, private/public relations, public sphere",
author = "Pauline Johnson",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1177/019145370102700103",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "39--62",
journal = "Philosophy and Social Criticism",
issn = "0191-4537",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Distorted communications : feminism's dispute with Habermas. / Johnson, Pauline.

In: Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2001, p. 39-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distorted communications

T2 - Philosophy and Social Criticism

AU - Johnson, Pauline

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The paper reviews the extent to which main formulations in Habermas's recent major work, Between Facts and Norms, make ground against feminist objections to the Habermasian project. Although the later work does not tamper with the core project of Habermas's theory of modernity, the terms in which the procedural norms of democratic interaction are now conceived clarify the sympathetic relevance of Habermas's project to feminism's own vital concerns. There is reason to suppose Habermas's construction of the motivations that prompt and guide struggles to achieve personal autonomy is rather too narrowly conceived to capture the range of impulses that inform contemporary feminism. Despite this, I suggest that there remain good reasons for supposing that the recent conception of the project opens up the possibility for a more positive stage in Habermas's dialogue with feminism.

AB - The paper reviews the extent to which main formulations in Habermas's recent major work, Between Facts and Norms, make ground against feminist objections to the Habermasian project. Although the later work does not tamper with the core project of Habermas's theory of modernity, the terms in which the procedural norms of democratic interaction are now conceived clarify the sympathetic relevance of Habermas's project to feminism's own vital concerns. There is reason to suppose Habermas's construction of the motivations that prompt and guide struggles to achieve personal autonomy is rather too narrowly conceived to capture the range of impulses that inform contemporary feminism. Despite this, I suggest that there remain good reasons for supposing that the recent conception of the project opens up the possibility for a more positive stage in Habermas's dialogue with feminism.

KW - aesthetic communication

KW - feminism

KW - Habermas

KW - private/public relations

KW - public sphere

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84998080767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/019145370102700103

DO - 10.1177/019145370102700103

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 39

EP - 62

JO - Philosophy and Social Criticism

JF - Philosophy and Social Criticism

SN - 0191-4537

IS - 1

ER -