Do findings identified on magnetic resonance imaging predict future neck pain?: A systematic review

Laura Hill, David Aboud, James Elliott, John Magnussen, Michele Sterling, Daniel Steffens, Mark J. Hancock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background Context: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to identify pathology contributing to neck pain. However, the importance of findings on MRI remains unclear. Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether findings on cervical spine MRI predict future neck pain. Study Design: A systematic review was carried out. Patient Sample: People with or without neck pain comprised the study sample. Outcome Measures: Clinically important neck pain outcomes such as pain and disability. Methods: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42016049228]. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases were searched. Prospective cohort studies investigating the association between baseline MRI findings and clinical outcome were included. Cohorts with serious underlying diseases as the cause of their neck pain were excluded. Associations between MRI findings and neck pain outcomes were extracted from the included studies. Results: A total of 12 studies met all inclusion criteria. Eight studies presented data on participants with current neck pain, two studies included a mixed sample, and two studies included a sample of participants with no current neck pain. Because of the heterogeneity between the studies in terms of MRI findings, populations, and clinical outcomes investigated, it was not possible to pool the results. No consistent associations between MRI findings and future outcomes were identified. Single studies of populations with neck pain reported significant associations for neck muscle fatty infiltrate (risk ratio [RR]: 21.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.97-148.31) with persistent neck disability; disc protrusion (mean difference ranged from -1.83 to -2.88 on a 10-point pain scale), and disc degeneration (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36-0.98) with neck pain. In a population without pain, the development of foraminal stenosis over a 10-year period was associated with development of neck pain (RR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.23-7.23). Conclusion: The limited number, heterogeneity, and small sample size of the included studies do not permit definitive conclusions on the association between MRI findings of the cervical spine with future neck pain.

LanguageEnglish
Pages880-891
Number of pages12
JournalSpine Journal
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Fingerprint

Neck Pain
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Pain
Spine
Population
Neck Muscles
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
MEDLINE
Sample Size
Pathologic Constriction
Cohort Studies
Neck
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Prospective Studies

Cite this

Hill, Laura ; Aboud, David ; Elliott, James ; Magnussen, John ; Sterling, Michele ; Steffens, Daniel ; Hancock, Mark J. / Do findings identified on magnetic resonance imaging predict future neck pain? A systematic review. In: Spine Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 880-891.
@article{43066a5c1ca7418a895eced06b8adc73,
title = "Do findings identified on magnetic resonance imaging predict future neck pain?: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background Context: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to identify pathology contributing to neck pain. However, the importance of findings on MRI remains unclear. Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether findings on cervical spine MRI predict future neck pain. Study Design: A systematic review was carried out. Patient Sample: People with or without neck pain comprised the study sample. Outcome Measures: Clinically important neck pain outcomes such as pain and disability. Methods: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42016049228]. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases were searched. Prospective cohort studies investigating the association between baseline MRI findings and clinical outcome were included. Cohorts with serious underlying diseases as the cause of their neck pain were excluded. Associations between MRI findings and neck pain outcomes were extracted from the included studies. Results: A total of 12 studies met all inclusion criteria. Eight studies presented data on participants with current neck pain, two studies included a mixed sample, and two studies included a sample of participants with no current neck pain. Because of the heterogeneity between the studies in terms of MRI findings, populations, and clinical outcomes investigated, it was not possible to pool the results. No consistent associations between MRI findings and future outcomes were identified. Single studies of populations with neck pain reported significant associations for neck muscle fatty infiltrate (risk ratio [RR]: 21.00, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 2.97-148.31) with persistent neck disability; disc protrusion (mean difference ranged from -1.83 to -2.88 on a 10-point pain scale), and disc degeneration (RR: 0.59; 95{\%} CI: 0.36-0.98) with neck pain. In a population without pain, the development of foraminal stenosis over a 10-year period was associated with development of neck pain (RR: 2.99; 95{\%} CI: 1.23-7.23). Conclusion: The limited number, heterogeneity, and small sample size of the included studies do not permit definitive conclusions on the association between MRI findings of the cervical spine with future neck pain.",
keywords = "Diagnosis, Imaging, Magnetic resonance imaging, Neck pain, Prognosis, Systematic review",
author = "Laura Hill and David Aboud and James Elliott and John Magnussen and Michele Sterling and Daniel Steffens and Hancock, {Mark J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.025",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "880--891",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Do findings identified on magnetic resonance imaging predict future neck pain? A systematic review. / Hill, Laura; Aboud, David; Elliott, James; Magnussen, John; Sterling, Michele; Steffens, Daniel; Hancock, Mark J.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 18, No. 5, 05.2018, p. 880-891.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do findings identified on magnetic resonance imaging predict future neck pain?

T2 - Spine Journal

AU - Hill,Laura

AU - Aboud,David

AU - Elliott,James

AU - Magnussen,John

AU - Sterling,Michele

AU - Steffens,Daniel

AU - Hancock,Mark J.

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - Background Context: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to identify pathology contributing to neck pain. However, the importance of findings on MRI remains unclear. Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether findings on cervical spine MRI predict future neck pain. Study Design: A systematic review was carried out. Patient Sample: People with or without neck pain comprised the study sample. Outcome Measures: Clinically important neck pain outcomes such as pain and disability. Methods: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42016049228]. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases were searched. Prospective cohort studies investigating the association between baseline MRI findings and clinical outcome were included. Cohorts with serious underlying diseases as the cause of their neck pain were excluded. Associations between MRI findings and neck pain outcomes were extracted from the included studies. Results: A total of 12 studies met all inclusion criteria. Eight studies presented data on participants with current neck pain, two studies included a mixed sample, and two studies included a sample of participants with no current neck pain. Because of the heterogeneity between the studies in terms of MRI findings, populations, and clinical outcomes investigated, it was not possible to pool the results. No consistent associations between MRI findings and future outcomes were identified. Single studies of populations with neck pain reported significant associations for neck muscle fatty infiltrate (risk ratio [RR]: 21.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.97-148.31) with persistent neck disability; disc protrusion (mean difference ranged from -1.83 to -2.88 on a 10-point pain scale), and disc degeneration (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36-0.98) with neck pain. In a population without pain, the development of foraminal stenosis over a 10-year period was associated with development of neck pain (RR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.23-7.23). Conclusion: The limited number, heterogeneity, and small sample size of the included studies do not permit definitive conclusions on the association between MRI findings of the cervical spine with future neck pain.

AB - Background Context: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to identify pathology contributing to neck pain. However, the importance of findings on MRI remains unclear. Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether findings on cervical spine MRI predict future neck pain. Study Design: A systematic review was carried out. Patient Sample: People with or without neck pain comprised the study sample. Outcome Measures: Clinically important neck pain outcomes such as pain and disability. Methods: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42016049228]. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases were searched. Prospective cohort studies investigating the association between baseline MRI findings and clinical outcome were included. Cohorts with serious underlying diseases as the cause of their neck pain were excluded. Associations between MRI findings and neck pain outcomes were extracted from the included studies. Results: A total of 12 studies met all inclusion criteria. Eight studies presented data on participants with current neck pain, two studies included a mixed sample, and two studies included a sample of participants with no current neck pain. Because of the heterogeneity between the studies in terms of MRI findings, populations, and clinical outcomes investigated, it was not possible to pool the results. No consistent associations between MRI findings and future outcomes were identified. Single studies of populations with neck pain reported significant associations for neck muscle fatty infiltrate (risk ratio [RR]: 21.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.97-148.31) with persistent neck disability; disc protrusion (mean difference ranged from -1.83 to -2.88 on a 10-point pain scale), and disc degeneration (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36-0.98) with neck pain. In a population without pain, the development of foraminal stenosis over a 10-year period was associated with development of neck pain (RR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.23-7.23). Conclusion: The limited number, heterogeneity, and small sample size of the included studies do not permit definitive conclusions on the association between MRI findings of the cervical spine with future neck pain.

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Imaging

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Neck pain

KW - Prognosis

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042562422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.025

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.025

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 880

EP - 891

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 5

ER -