Do nonword reading tests for children measure what we want them to? An analysis of year 2 error responses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Nonword reading measures are widely used to index children’s phonics knowledge, and are included in the Phonics Screening Check currently implemented in England and under consideration in Australia. However, critics have argued that the use of nonword measures disadvantages good readers, as they will be influenced by their strong lexical knowledge and err by making word errors (e.g. reading flarm as “farm”). We tested this claim by examining the errors made by a group of 64 Year 2 children when reading aloud a set of simple nonwords. We found that stronger word readers were less likely to make a word error response than weaker word readers, with their most prevalent type of error being another nonword that was highly similar to the target. We conclude that nonword reading measures are a valid index of phonics knowledge, and that these tests do not disadvantage children who are already reading words well.

LanguageEnglish
Pages153-165
Number of pages13
JournalAustralian Journal of Learning Difficulties
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Reading
England
critic
farm
Group

Cite this

@article{c06fb104156f44d8a80d974c8c465e47,
title = "Do nonword reading tests for children measure what we want them to? An analysis of year 2 error responses",
abstract = "Nonword reading measures are widely used to index children’s phonics knowledge, and are included in the Phonics Screening Check currently implemented in England and under consideration in Australia. However, critics have argued that the use of nonword measures disadvantages good readers, as they will be influenced by their strong lexical knowledge and err by making word errors (e.g. reading flarm as “farm”). We tested this claim by examining the errors made by a group of 64 Year 2 children when reading aloud a set of simple nonwords. We found that stronger word readers were less likely to make a word error response than weaker word readers, with their most prevalent type of error being another nonword that was highly similar to the target. We conclude that nonword reading measures are a valid index of phonics knowledge, and that these tests do not disadvantage children who are already reading words well.",
author = "Anne Castles and Vince Polito and Stephen Pritchard and Thushara Anandakumar and Max Coltheart",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/19404158.2018.1549088",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "153--165",
journal = "Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties",
issn = "1940-4158",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "2",

}

Do nonword reading tests for children measure what we want them to? An analysis of year 2 error responses. / Castles, Anne; Polito, Vince; Pritchard, Stephen; Anandakumar, Thushara; Coltheart, Max.

In: Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2018, p. 153-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do nonword reading tests for children measure what we want them to? An analysis of year 2 error responses

AU - Castles, Anne

AU - Polito, Vince

AU - Pritchard, Stephen

AU - Anandakumar, Thushara

AU - Coltheart, Max

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Nonword reading measures are widely used to index children’s phonics knowledge, and are included in the Phonics Screening Check currently implemented in England and under consideration in Australia. However, critics have argued that the use of nonword measures disadvantages good readers, as they will be influenced by their strong lexical knowledge and err by making word errors (e.g. reading flarm as “farm”). We tested this claim by examining the errors made by a group of 64 Year 2 children when reading aloud a set of simple nonwords. We found that stronger word readers were less likely to make a word error response than weaker word readers, with their most prevalent type of error being another nonword that was highly similar to the target. We conclude that nonword reading measures are a valid index of phonics knowledge, and that these tests do not disadvantage children who are already reading words well.

AB - Nonword reading measures are widely used to index children’s phonics knowledge, and are included in the Phonics Screening Check currently implemented in England and under consideration in Australia. However, critics have argued that the use of nonword measures disadvantages good readers, as they will be influenced by their strong lexical knowledge and err by making word errors (e.g. reading flarm as “farm”). We tested this claim by examining the errors made by a group of 64 Year 2 children when reading aloud a set of simple nonwords. We found that stronger word readers were less likely to make a word error response than weaker word readers, with their most prevalent type of error being another nonword that was highly similar to the target. We conclude that nonword reading measures are a valid index of phonics knowledge, and that these tests do not disadvantage children who are already reading words well.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057230864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19404158.2018.1549088

DO - 10.1080/19404158.2018.1549088

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 153

EP - 165

JO - Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties

T2 - Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties

JF - Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties

SN - 1940-4158

IS - 2

ER -